Talk:Jack Wilson (jazz pianist)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to musicians and musical groups on Wikipedia.

An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article, or the current infobox may need to be updated. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, set up to organize and expand entries on jazz and related subgenres, as well as other related subjects. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information).

Music Portal

This article was nominated for deletion on 8 October 2007. The result of the discussion was Speedy Keep/Withdrawn by nominator.

Hello, this is Jazz pianist, Eric Reed. I must admit, in my haste to get the proper information out there because Jack Wilson had just died, I didn't read the rules as thoroughly as I thought I had. Sorry about that. If someone with better writing skills than I wishes to rewrite the bio and make it less "blog-like," (yes, I was somewhat non-neutral,) please please please do so. I just ask that you please don't delete the article entirely, as it does help to clear up some of the confusion with the British Jack Wilson, etc. Thank you, EricEricScottReed 21:16, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Hello, Eric. Sorry for the misunderstanding - the deletion discussion has been withdrawn. It seems I too was a bit hasty and missed a few important facts. Since it does appear that some editors are willing to work with you to knock this into shape, I am more than willing to give you all a chance to do so. Good luck with it! Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 03:43, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

This is about tag cleanup. As all of the tags are more than a year old, there is no current discussion relating to them, and there is a great deal of editing done since the tags were placed, or in some cases it's clear there is a consensus, they will be removed. This is not a judgement of content. If there is cause to re-tag, then that of course may be done, with the necessary posting of a discussion as to why, and what improvements could be made. Better yet, edit the article yourself with the improvements in place. This is only an effort to clean out old tags, and permit them to be updated with current issues if warranted.Jjdon (talk) 00:54, 29 April 2008 (UTC)