Talk:Ishkur's Guide to Electronic Music

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article was nominated for deletion on 8/6/2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

	Electronic music Portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Electronic music, set up to organize and expand entries on Electronic music.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.

	Music Portal Ishkur's Guide to Electronic Music is within the scope of WikiProject Music genres, a user driven attempt to clean up and standardise music genre articles on Wikipedia. Please visit the project guidelines page for ideas on how to structure a genre article and help us assess and improve genre articles to good and 1.0 standards.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on February 1, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

A deletion review for Ishkur's Guide to Electronic Music article was concluded on June 7, 2007. The result of the discussion was Undelete.

[edit] Ishkur redirect

the search for Ishkur was originally redirected to adad and was changed to this page without explanation. I have reverted to the original--Ted-m 21:09, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

seems OK. A disambigutation would have been a solution too. Regards --LimoWreck 00:35, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Getting more guides

We need to possibly get a database of guides that give samples like Ishkur's guide. This would greatly enhance Wikipedia.

Are there others? If there are, I doubt they'd meet the notability guidelines, that's the thing.. - Zeibura ^(Talk) 21:52, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hoax

A musicological non-sense: this article refers to a non-trustable and non-peer-reviewed source, that violates WP:OR, therefore should not be (troll-)listed as a reference or a guide in every "electronic" "galactic" "psycho" article (see the list of so called electronic music genres); the latters pseudo-(faked)-genres are just styles-variations of modern technopop. You can't fool the world. Be serious please.Doktor Who 18:46, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

That's not the definition of a hoax. A hoax is a Wikipedia article which is not true, not a Wikipedia article about a website which may not be true. This article covers the questionable accuracy of Ishkur's guide, so there's no reason to call the article a hoax. I agree that Ishkur's Guide shouldn't be cited as a source, and I doubt very many people consider it citable. - Zeibura ^(Talk) 18:52, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Yes, right, I agree with you, I mean only that this ishkur site is acting like a hoax because some "key" articles link it as a trustable site (and this is not difficult to check).--Doktor Who 20:14, 15 August 2007 (UTC)