Talk:International Energy Agency
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, which collaborates on articles related to energy. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| High | This article is on a subject of high importance within energy. | |
|
This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
||
 |
A story relating to the article International Energy Agency (or a previous version of it) was included in the news section of the Energy Portal. Please consider updating the portal news with any major developments on this topic. |  |
|
Information from International Energy Agency (or a previous version of it) is being actively used in the pool of 'Did you know?' facts on the Energy Portal. | |
Contents |
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:IEA logo.gif
Image:IEA logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:12, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Dubious
I added the dubious tag as it seems somewhat untrue from what I understand. Global strategic petroleum reserves isn't clear in some cases but it seems to me to imply most of the stores are petroleum i.e. crude oil not petroleum products (i.e. petrol, diesel etc). In Japan the government reserves are petroleum not petroleum products (there are some privately held petroleum products as a reserve but most of the reserve is petroleum). And the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve which is after all about 1/5 of the reserves is mostly crude oil according to that article. Nil Einne (talk) 15:11, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] UK
The UK is also no longer a net exporter of petroleum/oil so I presume they need to have a (small) reserve anyway and are no longer exempt even aside from the EU. [1] Nil Einne (talk) 15:12, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Diese Meinung ist offensichtlich falsch:
- "Zudem schreibt die IEA, dass ihre "Energie-Revolution" bei den Treibstoffen für den Verkehr am teuersten und schwierigsten wird. Hier kann die Kernkraft aber am wenigsten beitragen"
- http://www.sueddeutsche.de/wissen/artikel/934/179384/
- Weltweit wird heute die Energie saemtlicher Schienengebundener Verkehr (BRD: Groesster Energieverbraucher ist die Deutsche Bahn AG --mehr als 1 Millarde Euro Energiekosten--) durch die Verbrennungskraftwerke aus internationaler und nationaler Kohleverbrennung und Dieselverbrennung gewonnen.
- Ersaetzt man in allen 200 Nationalstaaten in diesen Bereich die Energiegewinnung durch 500 Atomkraftwerke bzw. 2500 Atommeiler wird der Verbrennungsprozess Braunkohle und Steinkohle ersaetzt durch Uran (Metallverbrennung).
- Schaetzungsweise wuerden weltweit und Jaehrlich 1.000.000.000 Tonnen Kohlendioxid bis 2050 eingespart.
194.66.226.95 (talk) 11:57, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
