Template talk:Infobox Waterfall
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Usage
{{Infobox Waterfall | name = | image = | caption = | location = | type = | height = | height_longest = | number_drops = | average_flow = | world_rank = }}
Please note that all fields are optional except name.
[edit] Old Table
Lehamite Falls | |
---|---|
|
|
Location: | Yosemite Valley, Yosemite National Park, California, United States |
Type: | Cascade |
Total Height: | 1,180 feet (359 m) |
Longest Single Drop: | n/a - cascades only |
Number of Drops: | n/a - cascades only |
Average Flow Rate: | unknown |
World Height Ranking: | 195 |
If anyone wants to change the appearance of the template to look more like the old table that used to be on a few pages, go ahead. This is what it looked like (to the right). — Chris ( t c ) — 22:11, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
- I don't have the skillz to change it, but it definitely looks better without the internal borders. 5minutes 17:16, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] World Height Ranking...
Is this field really necessary? It seems like it could change frequently as that site adds additional waterfalls or updates existing heights. Also, not all waterfalls that exist are listed on that site. --MattWright (talk) 17:45, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- I'll echo this comment. There's enough debate about "highest" waterfall, whether talus is included, etc. that this field seems a bit extraneous. 5minutes 17:34, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] locator x and locator y
I think an optional locator x and locator y should be added, using Image:Locator Red.svg. This way if their is no picture of the waterfall, someone could add a blank map and use locator x and locator y to make a red dot. Nocturnal Wanderer sign 01:57, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
- Great idea! 5minutes 17:34, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Should we merge the two infoboxes?
{{Waterfall}} and {{Infobox Waterfall}} seem redundant. Should we merge them? hike395 01:45, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
-
- yeah, this one looks better. Most of the articles with the other template were added by me, so I'll go back and change them to this one. Cacophony 06:31, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
-
- This one looks good. Is it in use anywhere on WikiPedia so that we could see it in action besides here, where the picture is a nice, pretty red link? 5minutes 17:34, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- Lots of places: for example, Yosemite Falls where it is called like
-
Upper Yosemite Falls from Yosemite Valley |
|
Location | Yosemite Valley, Yosemite NP, CA, US |
---|---|
Coordinates | |
Type | Tiered |
Total height | 2,425 ft (739 m) |
Height of longest drop | 1,430 ft (436 m) |
Number of drops | 3 |
World height ranking | 18 |
- Done with the merge: {{Waterfall}} is now redundant. I'll call for its deletion. hike395 06:28, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Internal borders or not?
Should we use internal borders or not? The original {{Infobox Waterfall}} did not have them, but {{Waterfall}} (which was the WikiProject Waterfalls standard) did have them. So, I modified {{Infobox Waterfall}} to have them, trying to find a compromise between the two. I like them: what do other people think? hike395 00:56, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- I vote without. 5minutes 02:56, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
- Did a quick sample of other geography infoboxes:
Infobox | Has Borders? |
---|---|
Amusement park | No |
Bridge | Yes |
Country | Yes |
Dam | Yes |
English County | Yes |
Glacier | No |
Hospital | No |
Islands | No |
Lake | No |
Mountain | Yes |
Observatory | No |
Protected area | No |
River | No |
Spring | No |
Theatre | No |
U.S. route | Sort of |
Vermont park | No |
-
- So it does seem that borders are in the minority, although not rare. Anyone else want to speak up? hike395 14:16, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
- I just was poking through the common.css for MediaWiki, and found the "geography infobox" table class, which uses horizontal borders and not vertical. I just updated this infobox to use that class, to make it consistent with other geographical infoboxes. Comments? hike395 05:20, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- So it does seem that borders are in the minority, although not rare. Anyone else want to speak up? hike395 14:16, 4 August 2007 (UTC)