User talk:Inclusionist

Thanks Travb! I now give you a WikiCookie from the Wikipedia cookie jar! for your initiative to develop and create a new very useful template for a Colombia related article! great job! User:F3rn4nd0 06:47, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

		The Original Barnstar
		For keeping both your integrity and a cool head in the most trying of circumstances. 05:19, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		Awarded 20 January 2007 to Travb for his valiant defense of   the Wikipedia mission to produce a neutral encyclopedia.

On 27 February 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ludlow Amendment, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

[edit] Arbitration enforcement

Please cease the filing of frivolous arbitration enforcement requests. Thank you. Raymond Arritt (talk) 14:23, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] User WMC request for Arbcomm

After reviewing the history of User: William M. Connolley, and reading that Arbcomm asks to bring all requests for removal of adminship to them directly, I have decided to begin the process. Due to the fact that he is an admin, and the misconduct examples are so spread out, I have put it in a sandbox, User:HooperBandP/Sandbox4, so that all examples can be compiled by community and Arbcomm's time will not be waisted. All parties are welcome to say their piece there and it will be sent to arbcomm when ready, or to add examples to speed the process. (this is a repost of the message I received and felt from your RfC participation that you may wish to participate) --I Write Stuff (talk) 17:15, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Rfa thanks

Thanks for supporting my recent request for adminship which was successful with 89 supports, 0 opposes, and 2 neutrals. Unfortunately all I can offer is this lame text thanks rather than some fancy-smancy thank-you spam template thingy. I was very pleased to receive such strong support and to hear so many nice comments from editors whom I respect. I’ll do my best with the tools, and if you ever see me going astray don’t hesitate to drop a note on my talk page. Thanks again for your support!--Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 03:54, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

Your account has been blocked without prejudice. Thank you, — xaosflux ^Talk 14:21, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Unblocked by request. — xaosflux ^Talk 02:55, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

reblocked [2]. — xaosflux ^Talk 23:19, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] ArbCom

A new case really isn't necessary. The G33 case has Workshop proposals specifically directed at this article that look likely to be adopted. I strongly suggest you contribute there by commenting on those proposals or making new ones. - Merzbow (talk) 05:12, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

And it is the incorrect location for such discussions, as all editors of the article, should have been informed of the precedings if that was the scope, and permitted to bring evidence and participate in discussions. --I Write Stuff (talk) 12:24, 13 May 2008 (UTC)