User talk:Imoen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Heya, welcome to Wikipedia, Imoen. You might like to start by reading the tutorial and introducing yourself at the new users page. If you have any questions, you can ask at the help desk or on my talk page. Two useful tips are that you can sign your name using four tildes (~~~~), and that you can preview your changes before you save using the show preview button. You can regularly find new tips on the Community Portal. I look forward to reading your great articles and I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian. :-)

Ed pointed your account out to me. :-)

James F. (talk) 21:51, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Contents 1 serogroup B meningitis 2 Edits reattribution. 3 Request and advice 4 Suggested article. 5 West Highland White 6 Lupus 7 Thanks 8 Birthday 9 an autism epidemiology article

[edit] serogroup B meningitis

on the vacination article to added

A related problem is, for example, the expansion of serogroup B meningitis strains in the niche provided if serogroup C is largely eradicated through vaccination.

While I can find information supporting there being rise in serogroup B meningitis rates I can't find anything linking it to the drop in type C. What did I miss? :-)Geni 19:11, 26 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Careful? I'm sure 'be bold' is a wikipedia policy. What you've added to the article looks good to me.Geni 20:30, 26 Aug 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Edits reattribution.

If you want the edits you made as an anon (these) to your own account by making a request on Wikipedia:Changing attribution for an edit, but it might take a while - there's quite a lot of backlog, as it can only be done by a couple of people, both of whom are rather busy. :-)
James F. (talk) 12:50, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Hi Imoen. This is now done. Regards — Kate Turner | Talk 09:43, 2004 Sep 4 (UTC)

---

hi, the text for both articles came off off my a-level french coursework, i apologise if its similar to something else, but i cant remember!! Selphie 08:00, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC) **

hey, i had another go at Ankou, if you wanna have a look at it! Selphie 07:56, 2 Sep 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Request and advice

I hope you'll have time and courage to go through the articles in your fields of competence and ruthlessly weed out misinformation, clarify generalities, fill omissions, while you keep up a steady flow of excellent images of interesting subjects. Pay no attention to the furious creatures a little over a meter tall, who will be furiously kicking at your shins. Wetman 17:54, 2 Sep 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Suggested article.

I noted that we don't have anything at Ring species, and thought that you'd probably be the best person to mention this to (or, at least, the most productive).
Yours,
James F. (talk) 04:13, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC)

[edit] West Highland White

Thanks for the nice Westie photo! Elf | Talk 18:21, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Lupus

Imoen, my compliments on the SLE article. This is really a vast improvement! I have changed the criteria a little bit: in the old version, criterium 10 was still a positive "lupus cell" preparation. This has been abandoned in favour of antiphospholipid antibody positivity. References have been provided (although I'll try and insert the medical journal references as well).

Please stay and do more of this magic on other medical articles! Would you happen to know a surgeon who could help out at the Wikiproject "Clinical medicine"? (You're also invited.) JFW | T@lk 19:05, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Hi, Viki, welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for the kind words.

RickK 17:53, Sep 28, 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Birthday

Happy Birthday! Here's a tasty Birthday cake. Best wishes to you! Hope you enjoy your day. Now, get on out there and have some fun! ;)

--Jen Moakler 02:16, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

Ooh Mysterious. How did she know ... 21:31, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] an autism epidemiology article

Autism (incidence) might benefit from your reviewing it. It arose by cutting out everything unverified from Autism epidemic including, inevitably, the title. I didn't see a definition of incidence or prevalence which had been confused with it, nor any discussion of new cases vs incidence, in the other existing pages on epidemiology, so there are a couple of boxes in the article. It is undoubtedly the case that the new cases one could be improved. Midgley 11:09, 9 April 2006 (UTC)