User:Imaglang/AMA proposals
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
These are my proposals for "reviving" the AMA. I think they are very simple to perform.
Notice that in this page you will only find my own proposals, not replies to others' proposals.
Any comment, place it in User talk:Imaglang/AMA proposals.
Contents |
[edit] AMA is an association
AMA is an association, so then, members should have a constant interaction among them. I mean, currently, each advocate is doing his job without caring if the requests are piling up or if there is another advocate that is needing help and so on.
[edit] AMA is isolated
Also, we need to integrate ourselves with the ArbCom, MedCom and MentCom (Mentorship Committee). We must participate (or maybe the Coordinator) in the changes the DR with proposals. It's like we were totally isolated from the Committees.
How would this help? If there is an "army" of advocates (we could create a sort of "section" inside the AMA) only devoted to help these committees, then, the cases should be resolved faster. The result is: no more collapsed mediators/arbitrators. For us, the benefit would be the same: the request page would be smaller because we would be advocating many users before they put their requests.
[edit] Purge the AMA
This is the most important to me. It is unacceptable that User:WikiUser, who had and arbitration against him and a year ban, is still listed as an AMA member. Also, it is unacceptable that in the active members list there are members who say to be inactive. Or that there are members "redlinked"...
Proposal: revise which members did at least one advocacy in the last three months. Anyone who doesn't should be deleted. Then, the members list should be divided (as in the MedCom and the ArbCom) into Active and Inactive members so anyone requiring an advocate knows who's available or not.
[edit] About an election
It's necessary to bring fresh air into the coordination, but it isn't the most important topic to discuss. Anyway, I want an election in the short time (but be sure that I won't be a candidate).
[edit] About the AMA Coordination
It should be kept. My proposal is that the coordinator should be the bridge between the Committees and the AMA. Nothing more than that; we don't need someone with legislative powers in the AMA, but some who represents all advocates (a Head of State rather than a Head of Government).
More ideas could be added in the future.
