Talk:Harvester Judgment
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Harvester Judgment is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. | ||
| Stub | This article has been rated as stub-class on the quality scale. | ||
| Mid | This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale. | ||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian law. | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
Not to quibble too much, but this page should really be at Harvester Judgment. I know that most sources say "Judgement", but since this is a legal judgment, it should be spelt without the e, even in Australian English: [1]. I might move it unless it's going to cause too many problems. --bainer (talk) 10:38, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
- I am happy to have it at Judgment as the redirect will allow for both. As it is a very commonly referred to Judg(e)ment, also referred to as the Harvester decision and the Harvester Case (Macquarie Encyclopaedia of Australian Events), redirects should be in place to allow it to be found. Both with and without the "e" are in Australian English, though I acknowledge that legal terms seem to prefer without an "e".--A Y Arktos 22:52, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
-
- redirects created--A Y Arktos 22:56, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
