User talk:Haldrik/Archive 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia!

Here are some tips to help you get started:

• If you haven't already, please add your name to the new user log to let others know a little about yourself.
• Read the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the Sandbox.
• Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
• If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk or ask me on my talk page.
• To sign your name on a talk page, please finish your comments with [[User:TShilo12|Tom]]<font color="#008000">[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|e]]</font>[[User:TShilo12|r]][[User talk:TShilo12|<sup style="font-variant: small-caps; color: #129dbc!important;">talk</sup>]] 08:38, 14 December 2005 (UTC) (four tildes). The wiki will insert a link to your userpage and the timestamp.
• Not every subject needs its own page. Sometimes it is wiser to deal with certain subjects together on one page. See Wikipedia:Merge and Wikipedia:Redirect for some background. You may want to review Avoiding common mistakes to get started quickly.
• Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Enjoy! If you need any help, please don't hesitate to contact me at User talk:TShilo12.  :-)         - Tomer^talk 08:38, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Contents 1 Frotteurism 2 Etymologies out of synch in Cannabis (drug)#Ancient history and Cannabis#Etymology 3 Jesus 4 When Rob is Back 5 Jesus Talk Vote (again) 6 Unfriendly accusations of vandalism 7 A friendly notice about Edit Summaries

[edit] Frotteurism

Thanks...I hadn't noticed that there was a separate article for Frot. Tomer^talk 08:38, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Me neither. Regarding Tribadism, you might want to use the "Show preview" more often; this avoind using server space and ressources storing all the intermediate versions. Thank you for your contributions ! Rama 11:02, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Etymologies out of synch in Cannabis (drug)#Ancient history and Cannabis#Etymology

Please see Talk:Cannabis#Etymology redux -SM 07:50, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jesus

Thank you for your recent edit re:the second paragraph of Jesus. I do not dispute your edit (I leave that for others if they wish), but I do want to point out that the paragraph has been the subject of considerable debate which is nearing consensus. Arch O. La 05:32, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Update: That discussion is now in the archives. A discussion has been started (and possibly tabled) about 1st century Jewish politics re:Jesus. Arch O. La 16:23, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] When Rob is Back

Just a reminder: do not respond to Rob at all if he repeats old arguments or gets abusive. If he changes a consensus paragraph, revert it. Keep track of your reverts and only do it twice. If we can do this, nothing will come of it except frustration for Rob. --CTSWyneken 20:16, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jesus Talk Vote (again)

We're reaching a consensus vote that just might stick. Please come and vote. --CTSWyneken 14:15, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unfriendly accusations of vandalism

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Jewish views of Jesus. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 18:19, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Also be aware that continually reverting the same content may cause you to violate the three-revert rule. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:28, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

You are not to remove warnings from your talk page. This is considered vandalism as well. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:31, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

These so-called "vandal warnings" by ESkog and Jossi are mistaken, and they may be harassment. Please assume good faith. --Haldrik 18:38, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

• Your edits which claimed to be refactoring discussions actually were removing 6109 bytes of information. Whether you intended to or not, you were removing comments, and then re-removed them when you were reverted. We aren't warning you to be unfriendly, but to let you know that your actions are running afoul of some Wikipedia policies. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:42, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

If that's true, that was my error, and I appreciate you correcting it. --Haldrik 18:46, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Actually, I was in the process of pasting that missing text, which included "Tests of a true or false prophet", when the reverts interrupted my editing. --Haldrik 19:17, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

I apologize for the misunderstanding then. Our bot on IRC watches for any mass additions/deletions from articles, and we may not always check as closely as we ought to when we revert, in the interest of time. (ESkog)^(Talk) 19:32, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] A friendly notice about Edit Summaries

Please can you considering using Edit Summaries? It's optional, but looking at a page like this it just shows lots of edits and it's difficult to track who is doing what. Thanks for the understanding. His Imposingness, the Grand Moff Deskana (talk) 19:48, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Pretty please? His Imposingness, the Grand Moff Deskana (talk) 13:56, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

I'm not in the habit yet but will work on it. ;) --Haldrik 14:11, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

PS, I'll restrict the m for minor edits without a summary, for cleaning up grammar and diction, without change in the text's current meaning. I'll make use summaries if I introduce any change in meaning. --Haldrik 14:16, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very greatly appreciated. -- His Imposingness, the Grand Moff Deskana (talk) 15:19, 6 March 2006 (UTC)