Talk:Gucci Gang controversy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gucci Gang controversy article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:
Tambayan Philippines     (Rated B-Class) This article is within the scope of Tambayan Philippines, the WikiProject and notice board for topics related to the Philippines. To participate, visit the Tambayan for more information. B This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. WikiProject Australia      (Rated B-Class) Portal Gucci Gang controversy is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. B This article has been rated as B-class on the quality scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Assessment comments The following comments were left by the assessors: (edit · history · watch · refresh) Article given a Low rating because the issue involves a single country, which does not affect blogging worldwide. Starczamora (talk) 09:17, 16 March 2008 (UTC) Blogging WikiProject (Rated B-Class) This article is part of Blogging WikiProject, an attempt to build better coverage of Blogging on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the Project Page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page. B This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale. See comments for details. Low This article has been rated as Low-Priority on the priority scale.
This article has an assessment summary page.

This article was nominated for deletion on 18 March 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

[edit] Names of Gucci Gang members

Please do not include the names of the Gucci Gang unless stated by an independent source (even though they were mentioned in Brian's blog). Starczamora (talk) 16:24, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] considered for deletion?

why is this article considered for deletion? have the "high-profile" people involved here reached the wiki, too? the article, for me, is fair and objective. it is not deregatory in any sense whatsoever, and both side of the case have been presented, though briefly, to the readers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.87.145.90 (talk) 07:08, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Please place your argument here. Thank you. Starczamora (talk) 14:45, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

If LOLCats and Tina Tinio can have their own wiki pages, why can't this issue have an entry? No to deletion! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Angrydoc (talk • contribs) 04:43, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] LGBT Category

I've removed the "LGBT culture in Australia" because the only thing LGBT about this is that Brian's boyfriend is the accuser. Other than that, there's no indication that the situation is LGBT-related. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 05:04, 27 March 2008 (UTC)