Talk:Great North Eastern Railway

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments)
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale within the Trains WikiProject.
	This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Railways.
	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport in Scotland. Mid Importance: mid within Transport in Scotland WikiProject.

[edit] Route of East Cost Main Line

This article states that the East Coast Main Line (ECML) runs all the way to Inverness and Aberdeen, while the article for the ECML itself states it terminates at Edinburgh. Can anyone clarify this? --Colin Angus Mackay 23:07, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure the ECML "proper" stops at Aberdeen. The line from Aberdeen to Inverness isn't officially classed as part of the ECML (and GNER's Inverness trains don't use that route anyway - they go via Stirling, Perth, and the Highland Main Line). Glasgow and Leeds aren't on the ECML either. AdorableRuffian 23:24, 29 Sep 2004 (UTC)

On the ECML page I've used a definition found in a Network Rail document. I'll update this page accordingly Dupont Circle 20:09, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Reason for Name

Is it not more likely that GNER was chosen, not "for their similarity to LNER, the company that operated the route before British Railways was formed.", but instead for their similarity to Great Northern Railway, which ran from King's Cross to the North? Tompagenet 18:21, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

It is probably a combination of the two. Willkm 17:05, 16 August 2005 (UTC)

GNER certainly play on the similarity to LNER (for example, using modified LNER posters in their advertising), but there's obviously an attempted link to the even older company there too. I've edited the article to mention both the GNR and the GER as LNER predecessors. FiggyBee 03:18, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

I can see no evidence on the web that the full name exists as a legal entity or even in the way GNER refers to itself.

Not uncommon, Great North Eastern Railway will be the trading name, one (train operating company) is legally London Eastern Railways or something like that. I don't know the reason for it, but it is nothing to stress over. Thryduulf 23:22, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Train times

I see the purpose of including the frequency of trains to various stations, but I wonder about the appropriateness of including the exact departure and arrival times, as these seem to me very prone to frequent changes, and therefore perhaps not quite encyclopædic. Does anyone else have any thoughts about this matter? David Arthur 15:19, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] What's a TOC?

Sorry, I just couldn't see an explanation or link to an explanation for this acronym, despite its repeated use in the article. Zzrbiker 03:15, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] use of Drawn by in fleet details

This is an old fashioned and technically incorrect way to describe the method of train propulsion. The generally accepted industry term is "hauled" when the 225 is leading and "propelled" when the train is led by the non-powered driving van. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Leaky caldron (talk • contribs) 21:17, 12 January 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Update needed

GNER has been stripped of its franchise:- see

http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30400-13556829,00.html

Someone should edit the page so that it reflects the current status

[edit] "East Coast"

I can remember about the time of Privatisation, the ECML service was re-branded "East Coast" with a logo like the one used at Video 125 (www.video125.co.uk), but can anyone remember if it was re-branded before or after Sea Containers took over? It may be worth adding if anyone can find a reference. 82.26.191.83 01:32, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:GNER logo red.gif

Image:GNER logo red.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:53, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] ‘Class 82’

An image that was posted in this article depicting the number of a Mark IV driving van trailer, identified in the article as ‘Class 82’.

Carriages (including driving van trailers) are numbered in a different system than locomotives and multiple units, so even though a DVT’s number begins with 82, it is not referred to as ‘Class 82’; the actual Class 82 is an electric locomotive used on the West Coast Main line when it was first electrified. Though the initial numbers of similar carriages often coincide, carriages are usually categorised not by number, but by which generation of carriage they belong to (GNER use Mark IIIs and Mark IVs).

This becomes even more complicated with multiple units, since both the unit and the individual carriages are numbered; the Class 175 units, for example, consist of carriages numbered in the 50,000s, 56,000s, and 79,000s. The articles British Rail locomotive and multiple unit numbering and classification and British carriage and wagon numbering and classification explain the two complicated systems. David Arthur 16:18, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Chapter 11

I notice the term Chapter 11 is used. Aa this is a US concept, was Sea Containers a US company? Ozdaren 10:05, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

No, it's registered in Bermuda. I don't know enough about US bankruptcy laws to understand why you can be registered outside the US and do Chapter 11. Perhaps it only protects you from US creditors? Dupont Circle 06:18, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks Ozdaren 10:57, 18 August 2007 (UTC)