User talk:Gordonastill
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Manx Railway Stations
Have you thought about creating a category for these, rather than manually entered the link back to your list page?
Please note that blanking your user page, as you have done really isn't acceptable. Might I suggest that you restore all the warnings that have variously been appended to your talk page. They're nothing to be embarrassed about you know. --Blowdart 08:26, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
The article “A Brass Celebration” has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 14:26, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Blackcurrant Jack
A tag has been placed on Blackcurrant Jack, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Improbcat 15:32, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Liveries of the Great Western Railway
A tag has been placed on Liveries of the Great Western Railway, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD G2.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Phgao 14:14, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Notability of Peveril
A tag has been placed on Peveril requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Brewcrewer (talk) 23:57, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Notability of Douglas Head Restaurant
A tag has been placed on Douglas Head Restaurant requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Brewcrewer (talk) 00:34, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] The Passionate Pilgrim (1983)
A tag has been placed on The Passionate Pilgrim (1983), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Brewcrewer (talk) 00:41, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Notability of You Can't See The Join : The Autobiography Of Morecambe & Wise
A tag has been placed on You Can't See The Join : The Autobiography Of Morecambe & Wise requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Brewcrewer (talk) 00:44, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] long overdue
|
[edit] Bring Me Sunshine
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Bring Me Sunshine, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.codehot.co.uk/lyrics/mnop/morc_bringmesunshine.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:06, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Grant Taylor (Manx)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Grant Taylor (Manx), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. Brewcrewer (talk) 17:13, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Antony & Cleopatra (1971)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Antony & Cleopatra (1971), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. Agamemnon2 (talk) 21:00, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] see also
Hi,
You might want to see WP:SEEALSO for the policy on what should be included in a "See also" section. Also note that the "also" is supposed to be in lowercase. Best--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 08:09, 12 December 2007 (UTC),
[edit] Regarding your article, Auntie's All-Time Greats
Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Tommosimmo (talk) 11:06, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Style
Please read the manual of style whilst making edits. For example, headings should be in sentence case rather than having the first letter of every word capitalised. Thanks, Rich257 (talk) 12:33, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Peel Promenade Construction Railway
I have nominated Peel Promenade Construction Railway, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peel Promenade Construction Railway. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Tombomp (talk) 11:59, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Peel Promenade Construction Railway
A tag has been placed on Peel Promenade Construction Railway requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 00:27, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Ballacraine railway station
I have nominated Ballacraine railway station, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ballacraine railway station. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 11:22, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Jaaahn Kilgallon
A tag has been placed on Jaaahn Kilgallon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 15:44, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The Adventures Of Morecambe & Wise
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Adventures Of Morecambe & Wise, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of The Adventures Of Morecambe & Wise. Oo7565 (talk) 09:54, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Harold Flavell
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Harold Flavell, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Harold Flavell. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:55, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Laxey Browside Tramway
I have nominated Laxey Browside Tramway, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laxey Browside Tramway. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:13, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Manx railway articles
Can you provide any references for the various Manx railway articles you have created? Mjroots (talk) 15:43, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] List of Last of the Summer Wine episodes
Please stop adding "guest appearance" lists to this page. They do not belong in an episode list and the list. The list is already in bad shape and in need of clean up. Adding more extraneous information that will have to be removed during the clean up just adds that much more work. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 08:36, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- On the other hand, "guest appearances" may be useful information for readers, and arguably wp is for the benefit of readers. :) Abtract (talk) 18:28, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] May 2008
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to List of Last of the Summer Wine episodes. Thank you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 08:58, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- Hi, just thought I would mention that edit summaries, whilst being good practice, are not compulsory ... but I expect you knew that. :) Abtract (talk) 18:25, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- Abtract, please find something productive to do other than hound Collectonian's edits. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 18:28, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
