User talk:Gman124
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
| Archive 1 |
[edit] The Alien Costume
Just to let you know, I'll be redirecting that soon. Pretty much all of the information is original research (you cannot use circular logic or user edited sources to cite something), and anything left over doesn't warrant an article. TTN (talk) 16:33, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- most of the stuff is from marvel toonzone and none of the stuff is original research. Gman124 (talk) 16:37, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
-
- There are only two pages from that site in the production section, and I don't even know if they're relevant. For the rest of them, you're using the works you're claiming relate to this episode to cite your claims, which is OR, and user edited sites, which cannot be used. TTN (talk) 16:45, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- which stuff do you claim to be "OR", even though I think you are just picking on me for not have your way on redirecting all the episode pages. and i'm not making up false stuff if that's what you are trying to say. Gman124 (talk) 17:39, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- I suggest that you read over WP:OR. It doesn't necessarily mean that you made up the information. It means that it's your own personal interpretation without any reliable sources to back it. When you claim that X is based off of Y and cite Y as your source, you're just telling where you got your interpretation rather than showing that it is true. TTN (talk) 18:24, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- which stuff do you claim to be "OR", even though I think you are just picking on me for not have your way on redirecting all the episode pages. and i'm not making up false stuff if that's what you are trying to say. Gman124 (talk) 17:39, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- There are only two pages from that site in the production section, and I don't even know if they're relevant. For the rest of them, you're using the works you're claiming relate to this episode to cite your claims, which is OR, and user edited sites, which cannot be used. TTN (talk) 16:45, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
If you're going to keep bringing these episode articles back, can you please try to bring them to our notability standards? While what you're trying to do is fine, you're missing the target by quite a bit. Notability isn't established from a couple of fairly trivial creator notes and a review from a site that isn't really reliable in that area. You need information like in The Last Temptation of Krust, Zero Hour (Stargate SG-1), In Excelsis Deo, Last Exit to Springfield, and other good episode articles. TTN (talk) 19:20, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- I'm putting in as much info as I can find, and you said that you don't consider tv.com amd imdb.com to be very relevant, yet the In Excelsis Deo episode, half the references are from tv.com and it's listed as a good article. seems to me like you are only opposing cartoon articles and leaving out the others. comic articles are the one that need to be fixed first, like Star Wars: Republic, it doesn't even have anything on the main page, you don't seem to be bothered by that. how can you consider one thing notable and not the other. Also when you merge something you are supposed to move some stuff from the articles to the main page, why don't you ever do that? Gman124 (talk) 17:13, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, that one turns out not to be as great as an example. I was just trying not to overuse The Simpsons articles. Though, only one production reference is using it wrong, while the others deal with filler reception. It's not the best, but the other references sort of make up for it. My main focus is on episode and character articles, so I have no real interest in fixing other pages at the moment. There are two million articles to possibly work on, so "go fix everything else first" isn't a very workable argument. Merging comes when info needs to be salvaged. These episodes are just plot summaries, which are already covered. TTN (talk) 20:55, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
- I didn't bring back that many episode pages anyway, only three or four, the for season two of Spider-Man, I just merged season two episodes on one page, since the etire season was a season long story. trying to make it like a season page. Gman124 (talk) 05:24, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- That's why I stated what you're trying to do is fine, but you're still missing the mark by quite a bit. You've added nothing that actually warrants an article. If you really want to work on something, you should work on the episode lists instead. If you have official sources stating important pieces of information (not fansites interpreting which comics they were based off of), add those to the summaries or something. TTN (talk) 19:29, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- Some of the stuff is from people that worked on the shows and gave interview to toonzone, so are you saying that those interviews are not valid either? also toonzone has stuff about all cartoon shows not just a particular show and I don't think it's a fan site. Gman124 (talk) 19:48, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- Interviews are fine, but they're not enough to hold an article. It's essentially trivia without some real context. If you want the notes to be mentioned, all you need to do is rework the main summaries to be like "After Peter puts on his costume, he does x, which is based off of comic y. *ref*" Toonzone is just an advanced fansite. Like some sites, some of it can be used, but not all of it is great. TTN (talk) 20:03, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- Some of the stuff is from people that worked on the shows and gave interview to toonzone, so are you saying that those interviews are not valid either? also toonzone has stuff about all cartoon shows not just a particular show and I don't think it's a fan site. Gman124 (talk) 19:48, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- That's why I stated what you're trying to do is fine, but you're still missing the mark by quite a bit. You've added nothing that actually warrants an article. If you really want to work on something, you should work on the episode lists instead. If you have official sources stating important pieces of information (not fansites interpreting which comics they were based off of), add those to the summaries or something. TTN (talk) 19:29, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- I didn't bring back that many episode pages anyway, only three or four, the for season two of Spider-Man, I just merged season two episodes on one page, since the etire season was a season long story. trying to make it like a season page. Gman124 (talk) 05:24, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, that one turns out not to be as great as an example. I was just trying not to overuse The Simpsons articles. Though, only one production reference is using it wrong, while the others deal with filler reception. It's not the best, but the other references sort of make up for it. My main focus is on episode and character articles, so I have no real interest in fixing other pages at the moment. There are two million articles to possibly work on, so "go fix everything else first" isn't a very workable argument. Merging comes when info needs to be salvaged. These episodes are just plot summaries, which are already covered. TTN (talk) 20:55, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Unnecessary season splits
Generally, we do not split episode lists into season articles without the seasons having information on them. While that page is large KB wise, a good chunk of that space comes from the tables anyways, which doesn't really count towards needing to be split. If you want to split them, you'll have to find production and reception information on the entire seasons, which doesn't seem likely. If you could merge that one back in, that would be good. TTN (talk) 00:05, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
- Fine but once I find stuff I will split them because the episode page is just too long know because there's around 150 episodes.Gman124 (talk) 00:11, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Comics Articles for Deletion
One or more articles you’ve been involved in editing (Melter, Ringer (comics), Ego the Living Planet, or others) has been nominated for deletion. If you feel you can make contributions to the article to improve it and make it worth keeping, please do so. BOZ (talk) 14:58, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] An answer?
Was the section, that was below mine, the answer I was looking for? Does it provide the powers and abilities? Please respond on Talk:Superman X. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 19:21, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
- It is a little wierd, however, I think you should integrate that into the article. The only difference I see is the picture and storyline. Thoughts? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 22:17, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Wrong warning?
Friendly note: Seems you made a mistake warning User talk:209.222.44.66 about vandalism edits to Brochure as it was a different IP. -- Alexf42 14:23, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Archiving talk pages of Redirect pages
I don't understand your action at Talk:Star Wars prequel trilogy. Why did you move the talk page to Talk:Star Wars prequel trilogy/archive and then request deletion of the original page? While talk pages of redirects are hard to find, there is no reason to make them impossible to find. Jon513 (talk) 22:37, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- I see now that it is linked from Talk:Star Wars (film series), which is the most logical way to find that archive. I don't see any benefit in adding a "/archive" to it; why make extra work for yourself. Jon513 (talk) 09:14, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Asking about the X-Men's animated appearance on Spider-Man (1994 TV series)
The X-Men were animated under different house on their program than on Spider-Man's (even though they were meant to take place in the same universe). This was supposed to give you an example of what they looked like on Spider-Man when compared to on their show from around that time. Besides, how can it "mess up the table" when the image goes with the Spider-Man crossover section. TMC1982 (talk) 10:20 p.m., May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] List of Philadelphia Eagles first-round draft picks
Hey, thanks for your note. I'll take another look at it and reply on the FLC page. :) GreenJoe 13:19, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] FLC
Quick note to say I left more comments at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Seinfeld (season 3). Regards, Matthewedwards (talk · contribs · count · email) 06:43, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Re: List of Dallas Chaparrals/San Antonio Spurs head coaches
While you are indeed correct that the Spurs were previously know as the Chaparrals, see other featured lists like List of New England Patriots head coaches, List of San Diego Chargers head coaches, List of Washington Redskins head coaches, (and much more), who all previously were known as a different name. Furthermore, "San Antonio Spurs" is the current name of the franchise, and to people who are unfamiliar Dallas Chaparrals might confuse the list as two different teams. They were the same teams, just playing in different eras. I hope you understand, « Milk's Favorite Cøøkie 23:18, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Marvel Animated Universe
Just to clarify, the Marvel Animated Universe contains any animated TV show from Marvel to premiere in the time frame of X-Men (1992) to Avengers: United They Stand (1999). Therefore, also included is Spider-Man (1994), Iron Man (1994), Fantastic Four (1994), The Incredible Hulk (1996), and Silver Surfer (1998). Shows that came out before or after like Spider-Man & His Amazing Friends or X-Men: Evolution and The Spectacular Spider-Man don't count. Not every single Marvel cartoon falls under the MAU category. It's just like how Super Friends isn't seen as apart of the DC Animated Universe, under Bruce Timm. TMC1982 (talk) 5:14 p.m., 14 June 2008 (UTC)
