Talk:Glenmaggie, Victoria

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Portal	Glenmaggie, Victoria is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian places.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

	It is requested that a photograph or photographs be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in Victoria may be able to help!
	The Free Image Search Tool (FIST) may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

[edit] Overlinking

How is this overlinked? Please consider undoing your revert. Thanks, M-ercury at 00:22, January 7, 2008

Thanks for raising the issue here rather than bouncing reverts back and forward. Linking the word "town" in my mind is overkill. The word is a commonly understood English word that does not require further explanation for the overwhelming majority of readers. Sending readers to a link that tells them nothing they did not know seems to me unhelpful. As can be seen in Town#Australia, there is no formal definition outside common understanding, unlike lets say, township in the US, which does have a specific, specialised meaning. Looking at Category:Towns in Victoria, there appears to be stylistic consistency in not linking the word "town". My thoughts only and if consensus is to link I am happy to comply. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 00:36, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

I think that the reason I wikilinked it was due to... I wanted to see what the Town article looked like it, and figured there may be similar interest. There is a stylistic consistency there, and your point is stronger than mine. Unlinked it shall stay, and thank you for getting back so quickly. Best regards, M-ercury at 00:46, January 7, 2008