Talk:Gert Wingårdh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	The article on Gert Wingårdh is supported by WikiProject Sweden, which is an attempt to improve the quality and coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page; if you have any questions about the project or the article ratings below, please consult the FAQ.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

	Architecture Portal This article covers subjects of relevance to Architecture. To participate, visit the WikiProject Architecture for more information. The current monthly improvement drive is Johannes Itten.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the assessment scale.

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

Gert Wingårdh was a good article nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these are addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. Reviewed version: November 24, 2007

I think this article should be categorized assessed biography. I have written the piece and provided notes with links now that are relevant. Basically all information can be found in these URL sources, and other facts can be found on the Wingårdh homepage which I´ve also provided a link to. OK? Erik031 18:54, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Sweden/Assessment, nice work btw. --Krm500 23:23, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] De-GA

GA works through the directive given at Wikipedia:Good Articles, so one cannot just tag them as GA; it should go through the GA process of first being listed at Wikipedia:Good articles/Candidates.

Fred-Chess 19:04, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GA review

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

This article still needs some work.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   There are too many one-sentence paragraphs, you should try and unify them, the article would then flow better. When it comes to manual of style, the lead is too short and you don't have retrieval dates for any of the references.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   You should add some book references, all from the internet and blogs doesn't really make the article trustworthy.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   I saw that the nominator for this article is from Gothenburg, i'm sure you could find at least ONE book about Wingårdh... the article's main problem is that it's not complete, the most important things (career and architectural style) could be easily expanded with a quick search in your local library i'm sure.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   i saw pictures of his shopping mall and his ski resort projects, and they look astounding, aren't there any other buildings that could be photgraphed? Check out Santiago Calatrava's article, even if it is poorly sourced and there's almost no text, you can get a better idea of his style when there are more pictures.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Good luck improving the article!

-Yamanbaiia (talk) 14:48, 24 November 2007 (UTC)