Talk:George Boolos

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Philosophy Portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale.
Additional information: Related task forces (core areas): Logic Related task forces (major fields): Philosophers

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Science and academia work group.

The following was presented by Boolos in the Harvard Review of Philosophy, 1996.

Three Gods, A B and C, are called, in some order, True
False and Random. True always speaks truly, False
always speaks falsely, but whether Random speaks truly
or falsely is a completely random matter. Your task is
to determine the identities of A, B and C by asking
three yes-no questions; each question must be put to
exactly one God. The Gods understand English, but will
answer all questions in their own language, in which
the words for 'yes' and 'no' are 'da' and 'ja', in some
order. You do not know which word means which.

Now can anyone figure out the answer? (c;
If anyone needs a hint, let me know on my talk page.
- Eric Herboso 03:36, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

also available in Logic, Logic, and Logic, in case anyone finds it easier to looks for it there, under the title, "The Hardest Logic Problem in the World." The puzzle itself is credited to Raymond Smullyan, if I am not mistaken. (For the record, I don't think it's the hardest logic problem in the world, though it is a pretty good one. And yes, I did solve it myself. That strikes me as the best evidence that it's no that difficult: I'm just not that smart.) Captain Wacky 07:13, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 04:03, 10 November 2007 (UTC)