User talk:Geniac/Archive 2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| ← Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 → |
Your RfA
I am pleased to let you know that, consensus reached, you are now an Administrator. You should find the following forums useful:
Congratulations on your promotion and the best of luck with your new charge! Redux 11:12, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Well done, all the best, good luck with the mop! The Rambling Man 11:39, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- Congratulations Geniac! I hope you'd make a good use of the tools. Michaelas10 (Talk) 17:44, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
User:LilMane
Hi. I've noticed that you said that Soulja Boy is not a musical artist. Well acutually he is, what did you think he was, army man. He is a rapper from Batesville, Mississippi. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LilMane (talk • contribs) 18:13, February 13, 2007
P.Nandakumar (Rally Driver)
Hi geniac, thanks for the work on the article about P.nandakumar(rally driver), The article has been changed to further improve it, Can you have a look at it and see if it would be possible to remove the tag u put on it. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.111.107.109 (talk • contribs) 22:58, February 14, 2007
Thanks
Thanks for the welcome 65.10.114.122 22:20, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Corey Clark
Hi. An anonymous user keeps reverting changes made by myself and others to the Corey Clark article, including non-NPOV material that I have deleted, inserting an image whose source and copyright info is challenged by another editor, and inserting notes on that image's source into the article's Intro, which is not appropriate. I've tried speaking to this person on their Talk Page, but they do not respond. Any help? Thanks. Nightscream 15:47, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- The vandal in question continues to insert his POV material into the article. His response to me on his Talk Page was of the typically incoherent and fallacious variety, and he has indicated that he will continue to revert the article "back and forth" with me for as long as I do. Nightscream 19:59, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
- Geniac, i have sourced numerous times the appropriate links to any material i've added to the corey clark page. what is happening however is night scream see's only his opinion as being npov, and no one elses. The trouble with that is his point of view is biased towards idol and abdul. any changes he makes are to paint clark in a false light. for instance, a wquad story that nightscream himself added to the article said nothing about Clark fighting with his manager, it said that clark was in a food fight with her, and that they both had minor injuries to their arms, scratches is what the story says. he purposley left out the word food and left the word fight, to make it seem as if clark was fighting with this woman. All of his edits are negative towards clark and only share with the world his and idols thoughts and opinions about this young man and not the facts. The facts remain that idol and abdul publicly denied it, and clark and other contestants verified it. So where do you draw the line? At his and idols opinion or mine and clarks opinion. At the end of the day everything that ABC Put out on their special about clark and abdul was true, otherwise they would not have aired it for fear of the humongous lawsuit that would have been waiting for them at the end of the aired special. They verified and re-verified time and again everything that i've sourced to avoid just this thing, people mistaking facts for opinion. IT'S A FACT THAT ABDUL PUBLICLY ADMITTED TO HAVING 3 AND 4 HOUR TELEPHONE CONVERSATIONS WITH THIS YOUNG MAN AT ALL ODD HOURS OF THE NIGHT BUT SHE COULDN'T SAY OR VERIFY WHAT IT WAS THEY WERE TALKING ABOUT. The only thing i've done is put up the FACT that she publicly admitted to this. There are multiple eyewitnesses whom all came forward on the ABC special to tell the world that they saw Clark and Abdul being intimate together in a public place. It's a fact otherwise ABC wouldn't have aired it. It's a Fact that other season two contestants were backing clarks claims of an affair on national television, it's also a fact that these contestants also expressed their fear of backing up Corey Clark on national television due to threats that idol made of lawsuits against them. Everything that he doesn't have a problem with in the article basically to get to my point, reflects Clark in a negative light. And I've left all the negative there, since the beginning when i found this article it was %100 against clark, i left those point of views in place and added some positivity to even the article out, the only time someone has had a problem with my edits is when i say something good about this young man, and that's not right. There are too many facts supporting Clarks claims, and these people keep erasing them for fear that someone might actually find out the truth that idol and abdul have been lying this whole time. There are waaaaaaaaaaay more facts, evidence and eyewitnesses to support Clarks story than there are on idols side whom really just want this to go away. Please don't allow him to erase my edits again. Any changes i've made are sourced and i've referenced them. Now i'm not completely computer savvy so i may not be formatting all of my edits right, but that's when people like you can come in and say hey this is how you make the link blue instead of red, or really avoid all of that and just fix it yourself because that's what wiki is all about. I'm sorry i've talked so long but i'm completely frustrated with nightscream and the innappropriate way he continues to try and negatively portray clark, for god's sake the kid just slept with somebody he didn't kill anyone. I am going to revert the article back to the way i had it before, which includes all sources, and i would appreciate it if you, not nightscream could go through and make a unbiased decision on where the article should lay, and i'll leave it like that, like i said before i've left all negative things in the article, i don't change other peoples edits, i just add my own facts that have been proven not only by clark but by abc, other season 2 contestants and eyewitness accounts of the nature of this dispute, which is did he poke her or not, all the evidence and facts that exist point to yes he did poke her, there are evidence and facts, not just statements. Abdul and Fox's press release on the situation is a statement, that was created by them. THEY DON'T HAVE ANY FACTS, EYEWITNESSES OR EVIDENCE to come out and debunk clarks claims in the manner that they have, they count on people like night scream to just run with what they've said without needing proof, it's just their word no proof after they got done investigating themselves. Which in actuality what did anybody expect them to say, yes she did it, they are worried about their bottom line not how much they or abdul have affected this kids personal life and career. Now if i were just coming on here making edits due to only Clarks statements like nightscream is doing based on idols statements, than i too would be wrong. But i'm not, i'm basing my edits off of clarks evidence of abduls property which he couldn't have gotten without her knowledge or consent (i'm sorry i don't buy the he dug around in her trash story), his knowledge of the interior of her home and body which she didn't dispute she just said that it violated her privacy somehow, which i'm sure it does, eyewitnesses who saw them romantically involved with eachother in public, an ABC producer whom witnessed abdul beg clark for hours on his speakerphone to not tell the world about their relationship, his family were witnesses to phone calls to their home made by Paula which the phone bills corroborate and finally a reputable news agency ABC reporting the truth, unlike the integral fox network with the whole oj book thing (which is my own opinion and i wouldn't put my opinion in an article) i mean come on where there is smoke there is fire. And Idol and abdul are looking mighty smoky right now. Fox's statement also said (and i'll end here) that the networks attorneys "COULD NOT" substantiate any evidence or claims made by witnesses provided by clark to prove that any dealings with abdul (because she did admit to phone conversations with clark only due to the fact that she couldn't get rid of the bills) had no affect or outcome on the show. The words COULD NOT stand out to me big time, they never called him a liar, it was very carefully worded, and they didn't say he didn't provide evidence to substantiate his claims, only that THEY COULD NOT SUBSTANTIATE the evidence and eyewitnesses he provided, which reads to me like they weren't allowed to substantiate his claims cause the people payin their checks say they can't. When Abdul was asked about what they were talking about for hours at a time at 2,3 and 4'o clock in the morning all abdul could say was it wasn't personal and it wasn't about the show. Well that pretty much covers all of life don't you think, there are only two aspects to life, work and play, and if you weren't working or playing than what were you doing for that long, no answer?, well than the evidence provided by clark supports his claim of a relationship with her during his time on the show since idol or abdul have produced nothing but words to discredit clarks evidence. In one link that night scream keeps erasing the president of fox actually avoided a question when asked if abdul would be fired if found to have been involved in misconduct during the season with clark, to which the president of fox answered the sanctity of this competition is first and foremost...and his quotes continue essentially saying no if we can keep our cash cow grazing that's what's important to us not if the cow was out sleeping with a young bull. I know i'm paraphrasing and not sticking to directly what he said right now, but in the article i simply post the link so people can make up their own mind about it, and night scream keeps erasing it. It's almost like he's paid by idol or something to do this, i've heard of big corporations hiring people to just sit and blog about an artist all day, whether they are paid to say good information or bad, they do it all day long, and for night scream to have such a negative editing history on clark, it seems this guy is paid to keep making him look bad and erase anything that could potentially lead to someone liking clark. have a good night, i promise i'm not vandalizing, i'm just not going with the flow on this one, because i'm not a cattle, or a sheep or another dumb animal that just does what all the other animals are doing or accept, no, i have a mind of my own, and in my mind, and in the real world COREY CLARK HAS PROVEN HIS RELATIONSHIP WITH EVIDENCE AND FACT, And Abdul and Idol have done nothing but blow hot air and spend money to make it look pretty. If wiki is about the facts than i'm sure the article will look very similiar tomorrow to the way i leave it tonight. Take care. And what is so wrong with saying that SOUL TRAIN IS A LEGENDARY SHOW? It could be a matter of opinion until you look at the fact that soul train is the longest running syndicated show in the history of television, and had it's stage graced with multitudes of multiplatinum legendary soul singers who've all created hit songs and sold millions upon millions of records. I guess it's not fair in nightscreams eyes to give clark that credit. Even though it's fact.
Hi, Geniac. I will not take up a lot of space arguing whether the evidence for the affair makes it conclusive, since that's up to the reader, and not up to WP editors to opine within the body of articles. I will, however, touch upon only the behavior that has been attributed to me by ClarkFan (for want of a better name, since User:69.180.238.139 has not chosen one for himself). First, in editing/reverting the material about the food fight between Clark and his manager, I have consistently made it clear as such, but in one recent edit, accidentally omitted the word "food". I acknowledged this mistake when ClarkFan pointed it out to me, re-inserted it, and acknowledged this to him on his Talk Page, before he even wrote the above post here, which you can see for yourself on that page. Second, ClarkFan says that I keep erasing a source for a comment by the President of Fox. I've done no such thing. The source in question, http://www.imdb.com/news/sb/2005-07-29, has remained in the article throughout all of my edits, which you can see in looking through the article's History. What I deleted was the description of that link that ClarkFan provided inside its reference tags: "IMDB story in which Fox network President Peter Ligouri states that the sanctity of the competition is more important than proving or disproving if Abdul had an affair with a contestant while he was on the show". I would also point out that I left in material that he contributed regarded Clark's career, have conceded his point that Clark should not be called an "aspiring" singer, and so forth. The only material I have edited or deleted were the personal comments and non-NPOV flourishes he added to the article, and to the sources that did not support the material they were placed after, such as the Drudge Report link that did not mention anything about prescription medication. Most of the material regarding the evidence of Clark's affair, in fact, has been left in. It is merely the conclusions that ClarkFan reaches about them, which he seems to think should be placed in the article, that I've edited out. Nightscream 18:50, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
by the way geniac have you seen nightscreams page? What i suggested before makes a little more sense now. Remember on my other post to you when i said that it seems like this guy is being paid to negatively paint clark in a false light as he never inputs anything positive into the article about clarks career or personal life and erases anything positive about clarks career or personal life that is inputed into the article as well, and that big corporations like fox and american idol sometimes hire people to blog and go to chat rooms and either positively or negatively talk about a project or person all day long to bolster or damage that person or products outcome? Well it just so happens that nightscream himself posted on his page that he works for a marketing research company, the same type of company which someone like fox or idol would pay to discredit or give more credit to a project or individual at multiple online web sties or blog spots, kind of like wiki. just wanted to point that out, makes more sense now, to me anyway being in entertainment all my life you see these types of things go on all the time. It's sad that we just can't have the truth on this article. take care. 69.180.238.139 16:26, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- when i said this, i take fact for being the truth, cause there are always sides to stories, but when you have fact that is the ultimate truth, so by truth i meant i wish we could have all the facts on this article like we do now instead of just someones press release that's being stated as fact. thanks take care 69.180.238.139 11:52, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
8====================================~'pting
- Discrediting or crediting someone would sound more like the role of a PR firm or private investigator. Market research firms, on the other hand, do just that: They research the perception of consumers in a particular market. The company I work for is a part of Nielsen, and concerns itself with test screenings and press screenings of yet-to-be-released movies. My job is to recruit people to come to free research screenings of films and give their opinion of them (positive or negative), or to fill up seats at press screenings, and to be on staff at said screenings. All of my work is done in the New York City area, and I've never been to the West Coast, where Idol is produced, nor have I ever worked for Fox, or had anything to do with the television industry. Where you get the idea that any of what I do in my job has anything to do with Clark or Idol (or why I'd point out that I work for a m.s. company on my User Page if it did), and that market research companies "credit" or "discredit" people, I have no idea. Odd bit of ignorance for someone who's been "in entertainment all [his] life". Nightscream 19:06, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Geniac, the protection tag on the article says it'll stay there until the "editing disputes are resolved." I don't know if there is a prescribed procedure for this other than consensus, and since 69.180.238.139 is impossible to talk to, I'd appreciate if you'd weigh in on the various points that he and I are "discussing" on that Talk Page. I apologize for responding to him on your Talk Page, which I won't do again. Thanks. Nightscream 04:54, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- Geniac, given that I am now having to explain to him what the word "alleged" means, and how it's properly used, how he simply doesn't know what a "fact" is, that he's now lobbing childish insults at me, and even (doing some slight) editing of my own posts, I really don't think this is going to end with any understanding between the two of us. He simply does not care about a single WP policy, despite his statement of trying to learn. He has an agenda with this article, attacks anyone who challenges this agenda by upholding WP policy, period. I don't think there's anything constructive in this. Let's end this, shall we? Nightscream 14:42, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- those who live in glass houses shouldn't throw rocks. self explanatory. p.m.queef attacked me long before i even knew how to attack him, i came on the talk page to see him childishly attacking a new editor, me, on wiki instead of trying to help me figure things out, he has no obligation to help me, but don't cry about childish attacks when you are the initiator i'm simply showing you how it feels to be talked to like an imbecil, how does it feel? 69.180.238.139 19:49, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
8============================~'pting
Geniac, I would appreciate it if you would weigh in on the six points I outlined in my recent post on the Talk Page, and pending your thoughts on the matter, I would ask if there is some decisive action we can take to resolve this, such as asking for a consensus of other editors, for example. Thanks. Nightscream 14:26, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
- Geniac, can you respond, please? Thanks. Nightscream 18:05, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- Thanks. I've never heard of that policy, and I'm interested to learn about it, as I am whenever I learn about a new one. But just out of curiosity, why haven't you weighed in with your own opinion on the points being discussed? Nightscream 01:46, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Discussion on this topic from April 2, 2007 to April 24, 2007 has been archived here: /Archive 3#Corey Clark. --Geniac 19:56, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Edit to comments
The page blanking was in an attempt to stop the "New Message" alert from displaying on every page I saw. I now understand that there are people who are willing to make sure I do not do this, and that It is therefore a futile effort. Please do not get to concerned the next time you observe this, as the person probably got the message. 71.34.0.92 01:10, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
I'm not attacking punk
that user erased my article and you want me just let him do it punk.............. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 3ahmed (talk • contribs) 20:54, March 2, 2007
AfC mixup
Thanks for letting me know about that! Didn't make a tremendous difference in the end, one cited only blogs as sources and one only other Wikipedia articles, but it'll keep the books straight. Seraphimblade Talk to me Please review me! 16:59, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Message from User:Ciara me
Hi I am Ciara me, How do you make pictures and all dat stuff. And how do u make a wikipedia userhomepage. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ciara me (talk • contribs) 16:25, March 5, 2007
PHOTOS
BUT HOW U DO THE PHOTOS?
ok..........
So how do you put adobe 2 your page? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ciara me (talk • contribs) 20:59, 5 March 2007 (UTC).
THANKS!!!!!!!
THANKS! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ciara me (talk • contribs) 21:10, 5 March 2007 (UTC).
Ok
Thanks u d best.Ciara me 11:36, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Corporate Thugz Entertainment
Hey why u want to delete this article it is a real record label u can look at any Young Jeezy site and it will tell u this. So dont delete it or i will make it again and again and again i dont care how many fake users i have 2 make.Tru Soulja 14:57, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
About the Ten Sing page
Hi!
Tanks for cleaning up the markup. But why did you put in the cleanup message? Could you give me some hints regarding what needs to be improved? Henrik Dvergsdal 11:41, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
I need help with my user box
hello my user is owainbut and i have made a user box http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Owainbut/interflash and i am trying to do that thing where it apears at the bottom of there user pages of who has it on there pages thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Owainbut (talk • contribs) 12:37, March 9, 2007
Help
Hi, I was told that I can't delete content and I will be blocked, however the content I am deleting is false information on my client. I am not trying to vandalize in anyway, can you please help me and delete the articles which contain false/negative information. Thank you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.114.100.90 (talk • contribs) 13:16, March 9, 2007
Help Cont'd
Sorry to post again, I don't know how to respond. I'm her manager. Not her. Sorry if I confused you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.114.100.90 (talk) 21:19, 9 March 2007 (UTC).
Thanks
Thanks for all of the help! I read what you sent and it cleared things up a lot. Sorry about earlier I was so confused. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.114.100.90 (talk) 04:32, 10 March 2007 (UTC).
Quick Question
Why is my article being deleted? Please help me correct it so it won't be deleted —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mtoa (talk • contribs) 05:06, 10 March 2007 (UTC).
I wrote a few articles on a beauty pageant and someone named cocelan is going around saying that they're false and that it's run by me, when it isn't. He's giving a bunch of false information which is unfair.
I did or atleast I tried to. It's very disturbing to have someone making such false accusations.
Reply
To be honest, I have no idea why I did that, I don't see anything wrong with the edits so I've reverted. John Reaves (talk) 02:43, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Reply To Your Message
If i created it then its mine i dont care about the rules of wikipedia Tru Soulja 08:44, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- Who r u wat u think u can tell me wat 2 do im da king of editing ill edit u up out my wayTru Soulja 08:51, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- dont mess with meTru Soulja 09:02, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- just wat i saidTru Soulja 09:51, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- dont mess with meTru Soulja 09:02, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- Who r u wat u think u can tell me wat 2 do im da king of editing ill edit u up out my wayTru Soulja 08:51, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- LEAVE ME ALONETru Soulja 10:22, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Regarding "Wikipedians with articles"
Hello. No, this is not accurate. I put a photo of Sarah Silverman on my user page because I am a fan of hers, but I am not her. Thanks, --Alienlifeformz 19:31, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
You, me, a bottle of jack, and some Bob Dylan
Can't you just see it? It would be hot. We could listen to "The Essential Bob Dylan", swillin' back a little Tennessee whiskey, you know... get things started... Call me, honeybear. AndrewJesseBrown 10:38, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
?
Gah! That's what I get for copy/pasting to an external editor. That removal was unintentional. >Radiant< 14:23, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Cheers
Thanks for getting the "headings" right with the Hannibal article. I had spent an hour or so cleaning up the major content I had added - and internally linked the headings, which is not good practice. And I was not logged in!!!!! Shite. Ok, thanks though!Whataboutbob 22:23, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Taxi
Could you please see my question (effectively to you) at Talk:Taxi (band)#Request for sources? Thanks. - Jmabel | Talk 05:49, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Kai81123
he has put some thing nasty on my user page User talk:owainbut can you put a warning on his page thanks
Battlefield HS Edit
Thanks for the formatting fix! :) Much appreciated!
Bhs itrt 16:33, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Why not?
Would you prefer Jameson? It's certainly not the Bob Dylan driving you away. AndrewJesseBrown 06:55, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Bend High School Edit
I just wanted to let you know that you deleted unsourced material from Bend High School (Bend, Oregon) a few days ago. The material I contributed was awaiting sources from an archive, and was in no way inflammatory. I understand that it sounded that way, but I had no intentions of doing so. I restored the material, and included that citations were needed in the section. If you still do not like the material, please message me on my name BeanoJosh. Thank you.
Page Merge
I am in the process of collecting data for two separate pseudonyms of a British producer, his work is quite separate for the two names and feel that two pages should be maintained on WP. There is a case for a merge if there is a significant overlap in the information or if a page is very short and cannot or should not be expanded terribly much. Currently there is an overlap on credited material as he is often credited twice for different roles on the same project, repeated background information however will be deleted as I get more data. The genres each name is moving into are further and further apart (from his own admission in a BBC Radio 6 Music interview 15/3/07), as a result I feel it would be beneficial to keep these pages separate so as to maintain relevance to the page that had been searched on, people can then click on his pseudonym or real name if they want to know more about his background. Let me know your thoughts. The articles are Mark_Maclaine and The_Silence_(producer). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jameslenton (talk • contribs) 00:34, 19 March 2007 (UTC).
Edits
Thanks for the info, also is there a way to check how many hits my page has had apart from my own Thanks User:Mindys12345
wikipedia edits
thanks for the links on my page. Those will help a lot. I've started to get involved with removing vandalism with hopes of being accepted for adminship. Would you eventually reccomend me? Thanks a lot and feel free to message me anytime concerning this matter. BeanoJosh 07:09, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
User:Mindys12345
Hi Geniac.
Could you please give me some advice on transfering photos from my computor and into wiki articles. Thanks Adam / mindys12345
How Many Hits, User:Mindys12345
Hi Geniac. I actually meant the page, Sydney Coach Terminal, its the page that a created. Thanks User:Mindys12345
List of ling distance walking trails in Australia
The list of long distance walking trails in Australia was actually copied from that sight, so there would be no need to merge it. The reason I put it there is becuase that is the kind of info they provide backpackers at the terminal. It might be better for me to delete it. I have also taken out some of the other stuff that was in there, including all the photos. Would this be a sufficiant clean up. User:Mindys12345
AWB
Whoops, sorry. I try to be very careful about avoiding Wikipedia: pages when I use AWB, but every once in a while one slips through the cracks. I'll stay vigilant in not editing them. Evan Reyes 20:20, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the suggestion: User Talk edits
Thanks, but I reasearched the policy on user talk page deletions before I did it and it is clear that the user pages are not subject to the same rules as articles. I prefer to delete the closed conversations rather than take up server space. Most of the user comments have been rather uncivil anyway so I prefer not to have them lingering around ruining my day. Thanks again for the suggestion.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Absolon (talk • contribs) 23:17, 22 March 2007 (UTC).
- You said: "I prefer to delete the closed conversations rather than take up server space." Sorry, but arguments about server space are invalid since deleted stuff is still on servers, just hidden from non-admins. --Geniac 05:12, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Well, that's good information, but I still prefer to delete them. Thanks again.
Absolon S. Kent 10:53, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Sydney Coach Terminal
Hi I thought that if I created an article then I could deleted it. One of your administraitors made some sort of a nobrainer comment about the article, so I thought that it would have been best to remove it. The user that made the comment was User:Bduke User:Mindys12345
Sorry about that.
Bduke also said that the article was strange becuase it deviated from the subject, which it probably did, so I have removed some of the info and some of the photos as well. I probably over did it a bit. If I ever got the sack from the company I probably would want to delete the article. Thanks Adam User:Mindys12345
Congrats!
Congratulations on becoming an administrator! I certainly don't envy you; I think administrators generally oppose everything Wikipedia should stand for. If you want to reduce the numbers of orphans, do yo burn down the orphanage? See what I mean? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.96.212.147 (talk) 07:25, 23 March 2007 (UTC).
Tellabs Page Referenced
Hi,
The appropriate sources have been referenced on the Tellabs page.
Thanks,
Notashortstory 15:22, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Tru Soulja 19:31, 23 March 2007 (UTC)==Hey== I didn't notice that i removed the tag on it i was trying to edit it back to the way i originally created it.Tru Soulja 19:04, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- Thats not what im talkig about i didn't even put that part in that article.Tru Soulja 19:12, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Im talking about {Buck said that this was probably the realest song he's ever made.}.Tru Soulja 19:21, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Its ok and thank you for telling me anyway.Tru Soulja 19:31, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thats not what im talkig about i didn't even put that part in that article.Tru Soulja 19:12, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi
Hey Geniac,
How's it goin?
Hey do you mind if I recreated Gorko on April 1st? I won't unless i get your or another wikistaff members approoval!
23:41, 23 March 2007 (UTC)Theflippinchicken
speedy deletion help
hi i need help on deleting this page Los Draps i is in a foren language and i cant read it should it be on there own language wikipedia i have put a speedy deletion tag on it they removed it once if you dont what it for speedy deletion just remove it. thanks Owainbut 10:41, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
will do thanks!
I'm a newbie and still learning cheers —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Joehawayek (talk • contribs) 14:54, 26 March 2007 (UTC).
Thanks for the heads up on archiving, not deleting
Yes I was cleaning up my cluttered, discussion page. I had no idea anyone would take that as bing rude or uncivil but can see your point. Thanks for the message!Amadscientist
Thanks for the tips on Newton Public Schools
As a Wikipedia newbie, I didn't realize I was breaking the rules. Thanks for the friendly guidance. Also found your notes about archiving talk pages helpful (on your user page). --Ebrittwebb 21:58, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for fixing my User page
Thank you for reverting the vandalism to my user page.Inter16 14:34, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
IP 72.23.40.23
Hello, this IP recently vandalized the page Michigan, on the 29th. On his user page you gave him a last warning. I believe they should be banned now. What do you think? thanksStrunke 23:38, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
R-K-S/JJTF
R-K-S n JJTF FOR LIFE...RajKaria719
Geniac The Puff Got Told & Ripped...ON THE INTERNET! LOL!
He will probably ban me from editing. Oh well..GENIAC = WHAT A WANKER!!!
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by RajKaria719 (talk • contribs) 09:01, 30 March 2007 (UTC).
I fortgot to log in
I recently uploaded some photos for the article about Troy Cassar Daley, I forgot to sign in. 59.167.24.132 Mindys12345 01:26, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
