User talk:Gatewaycat
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 Archives |
| 1 |
Contents |
[edit] WP:UW future?
Hi Gatewaycat,
Sorry for the blatant spam, but you have yourself down as interested at WikiProject user warnings WP:UW. There is a discussion on going here that might be of interest to you about the future of this project. There are two strawpolls on the talk pages and the second one is about the future of the WP:UW project. Now we have the end in sight we are looking at wrapping up the project and merging it with Template messages/User talk namespace WP:UTM and creating a one stop shop for all userspace template issue. As you have yourself down as interested in this project we thought you may have some input on this issue, and would like you to visit the discussion and give any thoughts you may have on the matter. Cheers Khukri 10:21, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up! I just wish I'd jumped on the boat earlier, but I really admire what you guys have done—UWTs really are alot more accessible now. Note: I was too ambivalent to vote on the latest strawpoll on redirecting old templates; like many, I find the jumble of old UWTs quite frightening actually, but I do have templates I'd like to keep (like welcome templates, and more specific messages), and I'm sure others do too. I'm sure a middle ground will be found. --gwc 02:59, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Flux + Mutability.jpg
 |
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Flux + Mutability.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:36, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AP Stylebook
it's funny that you removed the serial comma from the text of this article concerning serial commas ... I've always assumed wikipedia style is to include them, since that's the norm for most of English outside the sty lebook. - DavidWBrooks 00:39, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Catullus 64
Hi, I have merged your Wikisource sandbox into s:Catullus 64/Lines 50-253. It looks like it is nearly finished; any chance you could clean it up? John Vandenberg (talk) 13:25, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
