Free-minded Democratic League
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| The Netherlands |
 This article is part of the series: |
|
|
|
Constitution
Cabinet
Decentralized gov't
Foreign policy
Related subjects
|
|
Other countries · Atlas Politics Portal |
The Free-minded Democratic League (in Dutch: Vrijzinnig Democratische Bond, VDB) was a Dutch progressive liberal political party. The VDB played a relatively large role in Dutch politics, supplying one prime minister. The League is a predecessor of two of the major Dutch political parties, the liberal VVD and the social-democratic PvdA. The social-liberal D66 claims that it and the VDB are ideologically connected.
Contents |
[edit] Party History
[edit] Before 1901
The VDB is a merger of two groups; one, the Radical League, was founded in 1892 as an Amsterdam secession of the Liberal Union; they left the Union over the issue of universal suffrage. The second group was the Free-thinking Democratic political club (Dutch: Vrijzinnig Democratische Kamerclub, VD-kamerclub). This was a club of Liberal Union MPs (in 1901 it had about twenty-five members, out of thirty-five Liberal Union MPs and one hundred MPs in total). The second group left the Union over the same matter. In 1901 the board of the Liberal Union, supported by the VD-kamerclub, proposed that all its candidates would stand on a platform of universal suffrage. The party congress rejected this proposal. In reaction to this the party's board, some of the members of the VD-kamerclub, and some of the party caucuses left the party.
[edit] 1901-1917
The two groups, the Radical League and the VD-kamerclub, merged in 1901 to form the Free-minded Democratic League. In the 1901 elections they won nine seats. The party always remained rather small, but because of their strategic position and quality of their MPs the party was very influential.
Although the VDB had split from the Liberal Union and the other liberal split, the League of Free Liberals, was against universal suffrage, they still needed each other to form a liberal alternative to the Christian-democratic coalition. In many districts there was only one liberal candidate supported by all three liberal parties.
In 1905 the VDB won two seats. From 1905 to 1908 the Liberal Union and the VDB formed a liberal minority cabinet led by De Meester. The cabinet was supported by socialist SDAP. In the 1909 elections the Christian-democratic coalitie regained its majority. The VDB lost two seats, making its total nine. In the elections of 1913 the Christian democrats lost their majority. The VDB lost four seats, because it was no the only liberal party in favour of universal suffrage; the Liberal Union and the League of Free Liberals had also included in their programmes. Furthermore the socialist SDAP performed exceptionally well in these elections. The leader of the VDB, Drik Bos, tried to form a cabinet with the liberals, free liberals, socialists and free-thinking democrats. The socialists refused to cooperate, because one of their major issues (unilateral disarmament of the Netherlands) could not be realized. A liberal extra-parliamentary cabinet was formed, led by Pieter Cort van der Linden. It implemented universal suffrage and proportional representation.
During this cabinet a conflict between the VDB parliamentary party and minister Treub led to his resignation. Treub left the party and founded the Economic League, which would merge with the Liberal Union to form the Liberal State Party.
[edit] 1918-1945
In the 1918 elections, with universal suffrage and proportional representation in place, the liberal alliance lost nearly half its seats. The VDB remains relatively stable with five seats, but they were nonetheless forced to a position in opposition to a Christian-democratic cabinet. In 1919, however, VDB leader Henri Marchant initiated the law for female suffrage. In the 1922 elections the party retained its five seats.
In 1925 the party was instrumental in the fall of the cabinet led by Hendrikus Colijn: each year the orthodox Protestant SGP proposed that the Dutch representation at the Vatican be removed. The Protestant SGP was fervently anti-Catholic. This proposal was always supported by the Protestant CHU, which was part of the Catholic-Protestant cabinet, but nonetheless had an anti-Catholic history. For the Catholic leader Nolens, this Papal representation was of utmost importance. In 1925 the VDB had convinced the other opposition parties that this was their chance to let the government fall and create a progressive cabinet. The entire opposition voted with the SGP and CHU, and the cabinet fell. In the following 1925 elections the party gained two seats. The party leader, Marchant, attempted to form a progressive government with the Catholic RKSP, the socialist SDAP and the VDB. He failed, however, and a new Christian-democratic cabinet was formed.
In the 1929 elections the VDB retained its seven seats. In 1933 the party lost one seat, but it was nonetheless asked to cooperate in the centre-right government led by Colijn, which consisted of the Catholic RKSP, the Protestant CHU and ARP, and the liberal VDB and Liberal State Party. The VDB cooperated in the budget cuts and the strengthening of the Dutch armed forces. The previously good relations with the SDAP came under considerable strain from this. In 1933 the party's leader, Marchant, who also served as minister of Education, stepped down because he had turned Catholic. Pieter Oud took his place as political leader of the VDB, until he became major of Rotterdam in 1938. In 1937 they managed to retain their seven seats. In 1941 the party was forbidden by the German occupying force. The VDB played a minor role in the 1940-1945 cabinets in exile.
[edit] Dissolution
After the German occupation there was a widespread feeling that a new political party was necessary, one that was not part of the pillarized system. This movement was called the doorbraak. Willem Schermerhorn became the first Prime minister after the Second World War. He led a cabinet composed out of progressives of all parties. In 1946 the VDB merged with the social-democratic SDAP and the progressive Christian CDU to form the PvdA. However, this party soon strengthened its ties to socialist organizations. In 1948 a group dissatisfied with the failed doorbraak and the socialist course of the PvdA left the party. These were all former VDB members, led by former VDB leader Pieter Oud. Together with the conservative-liberal PvdV, they founded the People's Party for Freedom and Democracy. The influence of the VDB on the PvdA soon weakened as the party became an ordinary social-democratic party.
[edit] Name
The party specifically did not call itself liberal, because of the connotations with conservative liberalism. They preferred the word vrijzinnig, which means "free-minded" or "free-thinking". It also has meanings in the Protestant church referring to more liberal, latitudinarian sections of the church. Democracy furthermore was a core issue for the League. The party did not call itself a party because in liberal circles parties were seen as factionalist and incompatible with the common good.
[edit] Ideology & Issues
| The Liberalism series, part of the Politics series |
|---|
|
Development
Schools
Ideas
Thinkers
Regional variants
Organizations
|
| Portal:Politics |
The VDB started out as a left, social or progressive liberal party, committed to universal suffrage and the construction of a welfare state. It favoured the democratization of the Dutch political system. Female suffrage was one of its most important issues. It favoured government influence in the national economy by nationalizing crucial industries. It also believed that government should play an important part in ensuring the welfare of the population; hence, it favoured the implementation of state pensions for the elderly.
Before the First World War it favoured an army formed by national conscription. After the war and until the 1930s, it favoured unilateral disarmement. This position was abandoned with the rise of international tensions after 1933.
[edit] Representation
[edit] Leadership
In this table the election results of the GreenLeft in Tweede Kamer and Eerste Kamer elections is represented, as well as the party's political leadership: the fractievoorzitter, is the chair of the parliamentary party and the lijsttrekker is the party's top candidate in the general election, these posts are normally taken by the party's leader. If the party is part of the governing coalition the highest ranking minister is included, otherwise this will read opposition.
| Year | TK | EK | Fractievoorzitter | Lijsttrekker | Cabinet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1901 | 9 | 0 | Hendrik Drucker | n/a | opposition |
| 1902 | 9 | 0 | Hendrik Drucker | n/a | opposition |
| 1903 | 9 | 0 | Hendrik Drucker | n/a | opposition |
| 1904 | 9 | 1 | Hendrik Drucker | n/a | opposition |
| 1905 | 11 | 1 | Hendrik Drucker | n/a | Jacob Veegens |
| 1906 | 11 | 1 | Hendrik Drucker | n/a | Jacob Veegens |
| 1907 | 11 | 1 | Hendrik Drucker | n/a | Jacob Veegens |
| 1908 | 11 | 1 | Hendrik Drucker | n/a | opposition |
| 1909 | 9 | 1 | Hendrik Drucker | n/a | opposition |
| 1910 | 9 | 1 | Hendrik Drucker | n/a | opposition |
| 1911 | 9 | 2 | Hendrik Drucker | n/a | opposition |
| 1912 | 9 | 2 | Hendrik Drucker | n/a | opposition |
| 1913 | 5 | 2 | Dirk Bos | n/a | Willem Treub |
| 1914 | 5 | 2 | Dirk Bos | n/a | supports cabinet of Cort van der Linden |
| 1915 | 5 | 2 | Dirk Bos | n/a | supports cabinet of Cort van der Linden |
| 1916 | 5 | 3 | Henri Marchant | n/a | supports cabinet of Cort van der Linden |
| 1917 | 5 | 3 | Henri Marchant | n/a | supports cabinet of Cort van der Linden |
| 1918 | 5 | 3 | Henri Marchant | Henri Marchant | supports cabinet of Cort van der Linden |
| 1919 | 5 | 3 | Henri Marchant | n/a | opposition |
| 1920 | 5 | 3 | Henri Marchant | n/a | opposition |
| 1921 | 5 | 3 | Henri Marchant | n/a | opposition |
| 1922 | 5 | 4 | Henri Marchant | Henri Marchant | opposition |
| 1923 | 5 | 3 | Henri Marchant | n/a | opposition |
| 1924 | 5 | 3 | Henri Marchant | n/a | opposition |
| 1925 | 7 | 3 | Henri Marchant | Henri Marchant | opposition |
| 1926 | 7 | 3 | Henri Marchant | n/a | opposition |
| 1927 | 7 | 3 | Henri Marchant | n/a | opposition |
| 1928 | 7 | 3 | Henri Marchant | n/a | opposition |
| 1929 | 7 | 4 | Henri Marchant | Henri Marchant | opposition |
| 1930 | 7 | 4 | Henri Marchant | n/a | opposition |
| 1931 | 7 | 4 | Henri Marchant | n/a | opposition |
| 1932 | 7 | 4 | Henri Marchant | n/a | opposition |
| 1933 | 6 | 4 | Henri Marchant | Dolf Joekes | Pieter Oud |
| 1934 | 6 | 4 | Dolf Joekes | n/a | Pieter Oud |
| 1935 | 7 | 4 | Dolf Joekes | n/a | Pieter Oud |
| 1936 | 6 | 4 | Dolf Joekes | n/a | Pieter Oud |
| 1937 | 6 | 2 | Pieter Oud | Pieter Oud | opposition |
| 1938 | 6 | 2 | Dolf Joekes | n/a | opposition |
| 1939 | 6 | 2 | Dolf Joekes | n/a | Gerrit Bolkestein |
| 1940 | SG | out | of | session | Gerrit Bolkestein |
| 1941 | SG | out | of | session | Gerrit Bolkestein |
| 1942 | SG | out | of | session | Gerrit Bolkestein |
| 1943 | SG | out | of | session | Gerrit Bolkestein |
| 1944 | SG | out | of | session | Gerrit Bolkestein |
| 1945 | 6 | 2 | Dolf Joekes | n/a | Willem Schermerhorn (PM) |
[edit] Municipal government
In its strongholds of Amsterdam and Rotterdam the party provided various mayors. The former VDB leader Oud was mayor of Rotterdam between 1938 and 1941.
[edit] Electorate
The VDB was mainly supported by atheists or liberal protestants from higher classes: the party was supported by teachers, civil servants, intellectuals and educated teachers. Regionally the VDB received most of its support form the large cities Amsterdam and Rotterdam, but also from provincial centres in Groningen, Drenthe, North and South Holland.
[edit] Pillarisation
The VDB lacked a real system of pillarized organisations around it. 'Neutral' organisations, which were not linked to a pillar, often had friendly relations with the VDB. This included the general broadcasting association AVRO (Algemene Verenigde Radio Omroep, General United Radio Broadcasting Organisation), the general union ANWV (Algemene Nederlandse Werkelieden Vereniging, the General Dutch Workers' Association); furthermore, the neutral employers' organisation VNO and the financial paper Het Handelsblad had good relations with the League. Together with the other liberal party, the Liberal State Party, these organisations formed the weak general pillar.
[edit] Relationships with other parties
The VDB was part of the Concentration the alliance with the liberal Liberal Union and League of Free Liberals. These parties had good relations. The VDB served as bridge between the liberals and the socialist Social Democratic Workers' Party. The SDAP supported two liberal minority cabinets, but the SDAP was unwilling to join a cabinet with these bourgeoise parties in 1913. After 1918, when the liberals lost more than half of their seats, the relations with Concentration dissolved and the two other concentration parties merged to form the Liberal State Party. The VDB continued to serve as the bridge between liberals and socialists. This strategy resulted in the fall of the cabinet Ruys van Beerenbrouck in 1925. The VDB was unable to form a government of liberals, socialists and catholics. In 1933 the relations between the SDAP and the VDB worsened as the VDB joined the Cabinet Colijn, which had a very conservative economic policy. Their cooperation in the Second World War improved the relations between SDAP and VDB considerably. This led to the Doorbraak and the formation of the Labour Party with the SDAP and the VDB is its major components.
|
|||||||||||
