Talk:Franziska Drohsel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

This page is about an active politician who is running for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Politics and government work group.

An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article, or the current infobox may need to be updated. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.

[edit] Rote Hilfe

To user:Soman: The "Rote Hilfe e.V." is considered extreme left-wing by the German Verfassungsschutz. And they also consider themselfs successors of the "Rote Hilfe Deutschlands" of the 1920s and 1930s, which was part of the International Red Aid. So please stop vandalizing this article. --Bender235 (talk) 17:13, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

1. 'considered' that is. 2. 'considers themselves'. I don't know if anyone takes that claim serious, though. 3. read Wikipedia:Vandalism for info on what vandalism is and isn't. --Soman (talk) 17:52, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry, didn't know we had a grammar Nazi in here. Further, the Rote Hilfe e.V. itself published a booklet on the history of the RHD "von der Weimarer Republik bis zur Wiedergründung in den Siebziger Jahren". Enough said. --Bender235 (talk) 00:29, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

1. This is a WP:Weasel phrasing, saying that someone/something is 'considered', without clarifying whom considers so. 2. The original RHD was a front of the KPD. The later RH has a very different political profile. The fact that the current RH wants to tap into the legacy of the original RHD is something best to be ignored. --Soman (talk) 01:09, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

1. I think you're right. I corrected it. 2. I think the very fact that the Rote Hilfe e.V. considers itself to be the successor of the RHD is much more important than what you think can be ignored. --Bender235 (talk) 14:52, 24 March 2008 (UTC)