Talk:Fort St Angelo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met Associated task forces (general topics): Fortifications task force Associated task forces (nations and regions): British military history task force Associated task forces (periods and conflicts): Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC–c. 500 AD) Medieval warfare task force (c. 500–c. 1500)

Looks like my edit got lost so the discussion is moot.--Shoka 22:44, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

I think that when people decide to allow a modern building to be built next to a national monument of great beauty with no regard whatsoever to the site in any way, this can be mentioned and condemned. It is quite neutral to, from a historical appreciation and awareness point of view, to point such a blemish out. The unfinished Japanese hotel on the Marsamxett waterfront is another incredible example, widespread corruption allowed a large ugly building visible for miles around to be constructed right next to the site which is basically their national symbol, Valletta.

Including such information tells the reader something about the site being threatened by development, its present day situation, as is happening elsewhere on the island, and is relevant as such.

[edit] WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008

Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 18:37, 1 May 2008 (UTC)