Talk:Force of the Breaker

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is part of WikiProject Yu-Gi-Oh!, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yu-Gi-Oh! on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale.
	Please rate this article, and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
Yu-Gi-Oh! To-do: edit  Project in its first steps: Come and join us at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Yu-Gi-Oh! ADD the ProjectBanner ({{WPYUGIOH}}) to all Yu-Gi-Oh! related articles & pages For instructions see the documentation on the banner template Help the project by adding the project-s banner to all pages listed at Category:Yu-Gi-Oh! Add a fair use rationale to each of the Yu-Gi-Oh! related images (see category:Image-Class Yu-Gi-Oh! pages)

[edit] New "Encyclopedic" View

I'm wondering if I'm the only one that doesn't understand why this page has an "Encyclopedic" style and the others simply have the card listing. Yes, I know that other games like M:TG include systems like this, but I just don't see why this is the only page that has it. I think that, unless it's meant to do this to every other set, this set should be the same as the others. Kalajin 20:22, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

• I started formatting the articles as such beginning with this page. Tactical Evolution also shares the same format, and so will all subsequent expansions. I just haven't gotten around to the others. Thus, feel free to go through the older sets to introduce the changes. --Benten 23:57, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

• • How exactly is this encyclopedic. Listing the cards seems to be the most encyclopedic thing we can do. Deltaneos 12:57, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

• Listing just for the sake of listing is unencylopedic. Listing if there is a specific purpose (as in, if one were to list the volumes in a series of short stories and publication information) is encyclopedic. The previous format used for the card expansions falls under being not encylopedic because the lists were just as namesake implies: lists, but without any accompanying information geared towards explaining the subject matter itself. Furthermore, the former format offered nothing in terms of production or contextualizing details such as release dates, mechanics, etc. The subject of these articles are the sets themselves, not the individual cards in the expansions. --Benten 22:10, 2 April 2007 (UTC)