Template talk:Fibers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Two more articles

So, is there a way to keep this format and still add in the animal fiber article? There is an equivalent for vegetable fibers too. Loggie (talk) 14:15, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

• They're both natural fibers, so maybe you could add '''[[Animal fiber]]'''{{·w}} '''[[Fiber crop|Vegetable fiber]]'''<br/> between {{nowrap begin}} and [[Alpaca fiber|Alpaca]] in list1; otherwise a "below" line might be preferable -- try adding this between the end of list2 and the }}<noinclude> line:

|belowstyle = background:#e7dac1;
|below = [[Animal fiber]]{{·}} [[Fiber crop|Vegetable fiber]]

Sardanaphalus (talk) 16:27, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Would it be considered bad form to do something like this in the 'Natural' section?

Animal fiber: Alpaca, angora.....
Vegetable fiber: list of vegetable fibers...
Mineral fiber: Asbestos, and others...

Thanks muchly for the help. Loggie (talk) 20:19, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

This change makes sense to me. Need me to do it? - PKM (talk) 02:58, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

I just wanted to make sure I wouldn't be stepping on anyone's toes. Loggie (talk) 06:02, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Vinalon not included?

I believe Vinalon, although not very popular, should be part of the synthetic fiber list. It is one of the first synthetic (possibly the second, right behind Nylon) fiber yet I don't understand why it still isn't in the template.

Jeffrey3732 (talk) 00:31, 11 June 2008 (UTC)