Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Andrew Bird
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Andrew Bird
I think it is an excellent photography, it illustrate the Andrew Bird article.
- Nominate and support. - Ericd 02:14, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose, very grainy when viewed at fullsize as well as blown highlights on the microphone and hands. –– Lid(Talk) 04:24, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Grainy. - Samsara (talk · contribs) 07:48, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Grainy, blurry, dark... not the greatest depiction of this subject. tiZom(2¢) 16:44, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Per above, though I do like the composition. --Tewy 02:23, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose, from an encyclopedic aspect and taking the FP criteria under consideration, I feel this image fails. But the story being told by the selective lighting is intriguing. Conceptually, it is a nice image.--Andrew c 17:28, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose, black and white can be pretty... but this guy was born in 1973 and I don't think feel that there is a good reason to have him in B&W without very good reason. gren グレン 15:01, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- Very low light is a very good reason. Ericd 13:24, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Not promoted --KFP (talk | contribs) 19:54, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
