Talk:Fear and Loathing on the Campaign Trail '72
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate, you can edit the article. You can discuss the Project at its talk page. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary at in the comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
I think that this should be called "Fear and Loathing on the Campaign Trail '72" instead and a redirect put in at this location to that location Theinfo 20:34, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
- You're quite right. Could somebody please do this so we have the correct title? --212.202.184.238 23:43, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Story.fearandloathing.jpg
Image:Story.fearandloathing.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:20, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
The accompanying image appears to be the paperback edition, not the hardcover; note the $1.75 cover price and the (apparent) corner crease in the upper right. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.160.250.253 (talk) 16:58, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
