User talk:Ezratrumpet
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello Ezratrumpet, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Alai 06:16, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks
Just wanted to drop a line quickly to say thanks for monitoring the Heathwood wikipage for vandalism. I'm a graduate, and I put together most of the article (heh... admissions? :-) ), so I'm especially thankful for your continued work. Thanks! Data8504 08:19, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Accreditation, etc
I've looked in (and briefly commented), seems to be a sensible discussion thus far. I'll check by again, but let me know if you have any particular problems. Alai 03:01, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Question on Concert Bands
'Twasn't I who made that move. I think you're looking for 68.118.100.118 (talk · contribs). Powers T 12:16, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Peanut Butter Manifesto
Thanks for reviewing my article. I'm uncertain that the article fulfills the a1 requirements for speedy deletion. I'd be grateful for further explanation. Best regards - Ezratrumpet 00:46, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
- You're writing an article about a memo about Yahoo.com supposedly written in 1972. Is there anything suspicious about that you'd like to revise? Looked like nonsense, considering the date. If there's a legit article in there, then please repost it with the proper info. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 01:46, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] User:Tarheelblue32242 edits
You're probably right to be somewhat cautious about issuing "standard warning templates" where you're the target of an attack or otherwise "involved", but those look like clear-cut vandalism to me, and would certainly warrant it. Indeed, I'd probably block without further ado, but since the account has now been inactive for over a week, that'd look pointless and/or punitive. If you notice a recurrence of similar edits, then by all means ask them to desist (via a bespoke message if that seems more appropriate than an off-the-peg warning tag), and ask me or another admin (via a noticeboard if you need a speedy response) if they don't. Alai 00:11, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Commons:User:Ezratrumpet
I assert to be the same user as commons:User:Ezratrumpet. Ezratrumpet 23:31, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] wikipedia song
I'm glad you enjoyed it; I had fun writing it. Bucketsofg 02:18, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] RFA nom
To be honest, I'm not sure what to advise: the nominator seems to be not especially active, so I don't know if they're necessarily 100% up to speed on current admin standards -- whatever those are, anyway. I'd suggest that you accept if you'd be ready to self-nominate, but not otherwise (you can always ask them if they'd be willing to nominate you at a later date). If I were a betting man, I'd guess if you were to be RFA'd at present, you'd at a fair bit of opposition for having significantly less than 1000 edits, which is a fairly common baseline. Hope that helps. And, thank you for the kind words. Alai 03:50, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celine Dion awards and accomplishments
As you've contributed to this discussion, I thought you should know that a number of similar articles have been bundled with the AfD. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 09:48, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Afd Notice - second time around for Unsolved problems in chemistry
Unfortunately this article has again be nominated for deletion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unsolved problems in chemistry. I know you tried to save it the first time around. Could you please help again. --Heliumballoon 17:34, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] 2006 Chick-fil-A Bowl FAC
Wanted to let you know that 2006 Chick-fil-A Bowl is a featured article candidate again. You supported the article the last time it came up as a candidate, but unfortunately, not enough other people agreed to support it last time. I'd really appreciate it if you could take a spin by the comments page when you've got the time and leave your support if you think it's still worthy. Thanks! JKBrooks85 23:05, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
