Talk:Extensive form game
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Game theory, an attempt to improve, grow, and standardize Wikipedia's articles related to Game theory. We need your help! |
|
|
|
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale. |
| Top | This article is on a subject of top-importance within game theory. |
 |
Extensive form game was a good article nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these are addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. Reviewed version: June 12, 2006 |
[edit] Merge
Game tree seems to be about extensive form games, except it primarily deals with computer science problems. I think it would be best to merge that content here. Barring that, I think that Game tree should be moved to a different name, and cross links should be included here. What do folks think? --best, kevin [kzollman][talk] 00:00, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- Agree. Pete.Hurd 00:50, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
-
- Now leaning towards not merging, but making game tree more explicitly CompSsi rather than Game theory. The backwards induction solution section in game tree seems to indicate that empty threats and information sets just aren't an issue in solving game trees. If that's the case then I don't think merging is in order. Pete.Hurd 14:42, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- Uhh, how long has this merge request been pending? I ask because this article has been sitting on hold on the GA nom page for a long, long time.... Homestarmy 19:36, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
-
Sorry, I think there is no consensus for merging the two articles. I have removed the tag. --best, kevin [kzollman][talk] 19:40, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] failed GA - reasons
The article itself is interesting, my reasons for failing this article are purely formating and referencing.
Gnangarra 00:45, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
