Evolvability

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The introduction to this article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject. Please help improve the article with a good introductory style.

Please help improve this article or section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. (April 2007)

Evolvability is a concept within the Darwinian understanding of biological evolution. Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection requires that plants, animals, and other organisms be able to produce offspring that are sometimes better adapted to the circumstances of life than the parents are. It is these offspring that survive and reproduce, and the adaptive traits thus increase in number if they are passed down to the offspring. If the only changes to be found in offspring were deleterious, adaptive evolution could not occur. So, the ability to produce enough advantageous variation to allow adaptive evolution to occur is what is called "evolvability".

Wagner (2005) describes two definitions of evolvability which have two main meanings. The first one is: A biological system is evolvable

• if its properties show heritable genetic variation,

and

• if natural selection can thus change these properties.

The second one is: A biological system is evolvable

• if it can acquire novel functions through genetic change, functions that help the organism survive and reproduce.

These definitions can be applied on all levels of biological organisation, from macromolecules to mammals. The two meanings are not synonymous. Not all systems that are evolvable in the first sense are evolvable in the second sense. An example is given by Wagner (2005).

Contents 1 Example 2 Robustness and evolvability 3 See also 4 References

[edit] Example

Consider an enzyme-coding gene that undergoes different mutations in different individuals of a population. Because of the mutations, the activity of the enzyme fluctuates among different individuals. If this mutation is heritable and influences fitness than natural selection can act on the enzyme’s activity. The enzyme’s activity is thus evolvable in the first sense. However, after millions of years, no mutation might give this enzyme a trait which might permit survival in a new environment. Thus, although the enzyme’s activity is evolvable in the first sense, that does not mean it is evolvable in the second sense. The opposite, does not work. Every innovative, evolvable system can evolve by natural selection.

Organisms are incredibly complex, yet also highly robust to genetic change on all levels of organization. This robustness is one of a few aspects that can affect evolvability in the first and the second sense.

[edit] Robustness and evolvability

Robustness will not increase evolvability in the first sense. In organisms with a high level of robustness, mutations will have smaller phenotypic effects than in organisms with a low level of robustness. Thus, robustness reduces the amount of heritable genetic variation on which selection can act. One can see this conclusion in two ways: The first way is that robustness causes mutations to be neutral and therefore no innovation will occur. The second way gives neutral mutations an important function in innovation. Although many neutral mutations do not change primary functions, they can change other system features for future evolution. So, robustness can facilitate exaptation. From this point of view, robustness implies that many mutations are neutral and such neutrality promotes innovation.

[edit] See also

• Modularity (biology)

[edit] References

• Altenberg, L. 1995. Genome growth and the evolution of the genotype-phenotype map. In Evolution and Biocomputation: Computational Models of Evolution, ed. Wolfgang Banzhaf and Frank H. Eeckman. Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 899. Springer-Verlag, pp. 205-259. ISBN 0387590463.
• Conrad, M. 1979. Bootstrapping on the adaptive landscape. BioSystems 11: 167–182.
• Dawkins, R. 1989. The evolution of evolvability. In C. G. Langton, editor, Artificial life, the proceedings of an Interdisciplinary Workshop on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems. Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, CA.
• Eshel, I. 1973. Clone-selection and optimal rates of mutation. Journal of Applied Probability 10: 728–738.
• Kirschner, M. and J. Gerhart, 1998. Evolvability. PNAS 95(15): 8420-8427.
• Nehaniv, C. L. 2003. Evolvability (Editorial, Special Issue on Evolvability, Dedicated to the memory of Professor Michael Conrad), BioSystems: Journal of Biological and Information Processing Sciences 69(2-3):77-81.
• Riedl, R. J. 1977. A systems-analytical approach to macroevolutionary phenomena. Quarterly Review of Biology 52: 351–370.
• Wagner, A. 2005. Robustness and Evolvability in Living Systems (Princeton Studies in Complexity). Princeton University Press. ISBN 0691122407.
• Wagner, A., 2005. Robustness, evolvability and neutrality. FEBS Letters 579, 1772-1778.
• Wagner, G. P. and L. Altenberg. 1996. Complex adaptations and the evolution of evolvability. Evolution 50 (3): 967-976.

v • d • e The development of phenotype Key concepts Genotype-phenotype distinction · Norms of reaction · Gene-environment interaction · Heritability · Quantitative genetics Genetic architecture Dominance relationship · Epistasis · Polygenic inheritance · Pleiotropy · Plasticity · Canalisation · Fitness landscape Non-genetic influences Epigenetics · Maternal effect · Dual inheritance theory Developmental architecture Segmentation · Modularity Evolution of genetic systems Evolvability · Mutational robustness · Evolution of sex Influential figures C. H. Waddington · Richard Lewontin Debates Nature versus nurture List of evolutionary biology topics