User talk:Ericthebrainiac
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Your signature
Eric, Currently, your sig is linking to an article called "Ericthebrainiac" rather than your user space (User:Ericthebrainiac). Please consider editing your signature (under "my preferences" at top right) to correct this. Formatting the link as [[User:Ericthebrainiac|]] (note the "|" pipe at the end) will result in Ericthebrainiac. Thanks! — Lomn 13:25, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, I see -- you're typing in everything manually. You can save yourself a lot of effort by typing "~~~~" instead, as it'll substitute your user name and the current time for you. Naturally, it's not mandatory, but it might be of assistance. — Lomn 17:58, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Dear Eric, On Wikipedia, everyone is able to edit everything, but that does mean everything is a good idea or even allowed. The Talk pages of articles are for discussing improvements to those articles. I have reverted your recent edit to Talk:Eric Lerner because it had nothing to do with Eric Lerner. Other than that, welcome to Wikipedia. --Art Carlson 14:56, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] August 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Bajo las Reindas del Amor. Please be careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Closedmouth 01:35, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] I'm Sorry
I'm sorry that I did but imdb.com says that the title of the telenovela was Bajo Las Riendas del Amor and I thought it was the right title of the telenovela.Ericthebrainiac 18:46, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Closedmouth may be offensive or unwelcome. If you are the user, please log in under that account and proceed to make the changes. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. — Scientizzle 23:16, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Do not move Bajo las Reindas del Amor to Hast deletion again...this is considered vandalism. — Scientizzle 23:21, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Lots of helpful links for you
|
Hi, I hope the above are helpful to you - have a look through some of the links, they can really help you make the most of Wikipedia. DuncanHill 00:30, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] I don't adopt users
I'm not much of a leader, and I'm useless at explaining how to do things to other people. But if you go to WP:ADOPT there's a whole page detailing how you can get someone to adopt you. Also, in future, try to keep questions to the person's talk page instead of their user page. I'm glad to hear you don't want to be a vandal. We have enough of those already ;) --Closedmouth 05:54, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- I told you, no. And stop talking on my user page. --Closedmouth 02:57, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your recent edits
Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 19:53, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your user page
Hi, Ordinarily I don’t mess with other people’s user pages. But you seemed to be stumbling around on yours. So I changed it to what I thought you intended. I hope I was right.
The mistake you seemed to be making was that you enclosed links in double curly brackets {{}} instead of double square brackets [[]]. Double curly brackets cause the transclusion of the referenced page. So for example, whenever you wrote {{User:Ericthebrainiac|…}} on your user page, the page transcluded itself.
While I have got your attention, let me suggest that you put very few links on your user page and on the pages you write. Use links only when you think a reader might want to look up another page. So for example when I wrote the preceding paragraph, I though that you might want to look up the article on “Transclusion”; so I put a link on it. Take a look at WP:MOS-L#Overlinking and underlinking: what's the best ratio? for advice on overlinking. --teb728 00:25, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Permission to edit things
While it's very sweet of you to offer permission to edit articles you create, it's already implied that when you create articles in Wikipedia, you release the content so that anyone can edit it. We don't need express permission. I figured you might want to know so you know you don't have to ask anyone for permission to edit things in the future. Welcome to Wikipedia! Kuronue | Talk 01:22, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] The difference between the NBC soap opera Passions and my original soap opera Secret Obesession
The above, as you well know, is completely inappropriate set of questions for the reference desk, or anywhere else. I'll delete it. Please do not seek to recreate it.-Tagishsimon (talk) 21:37, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Ciudad Paraiso
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ciudad Paraiso, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. Cxbrx 07:48, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your soap opera and the Reference Desk
We're glad you find value in the Reference Desk, and we hope that you find success with your soap operas, but the two need to stop overlapping. Specifically, questions like this one are quite unsuited to the desk, and we've opted to remove them. That said, it's much better all around that you understand why they're unsuitable (they're posing questions which are answerable only by you, and answerable however you like) and simply cease posting them. Remember, in fiction (and particularly in soap operas!), you can make whatever choices you like, be it cities, streets, illnesses, actors, or whatever, because it's your story! Best of luck with your writing. — Lomn 16:06, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] RD
Eric, any possibility you could stop asking really dumb questions on the RD? It may be amusing you, but I'm not sure anyone else is enjoying it. Your most recent question is clearly, self-evidently, palpably ridiculous. The RD does not exist for your amusement. Abuse it and you will sooner or later lose the right to use it. --Tagishsimon (talk) 23:59, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
- I have deleted these questions from the RD. Manning (talk) 00:10, 30 November 2007 (UTC) (Administrator)
- Once again, question removed from the Reference Desk. If you have a factual question, then by all means ask it, but the RD is not suitable for quizzes. For example:
- Good: Who sings Amor Comprado's theme song "Tal Vez"?
- Bad: If I say that Amor Comprado's theme song "Tal Vez" is performed by Ricky Martin, who do you say performs the song? Whoever you say sings Amor Comprado's theme song "Tal Vez" is alright by me.[1]
- It may be that you're trying to accomplish the good example, but posting the bad suggests that you're either playing some sort of word-association game or looking to edit articles with the first piece of unsupported guesswork that's given as a response. As noted by Tagishsimon above, abuse of the RD may lead to the loss of your right to use it. — Lomn 14:05, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] January 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Lethal Weapon 5: The Return of Sing Ku. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gromlakh (talk) 22:16, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Lethal Weapon 5: The Return of Sing Ku. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Gromlakh (talk) 19:02, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fame Has A Price
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Fame Has A Price, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Fame Has A Price. P4k (talk) 03:30, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Grupo Ashta
A tag has been placed on Grupo Ashta requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 21:12, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Fame Has A Price
I have nominated Fame Has A Price, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fame Has A Price. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. P4k (talk) 21:22, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] February 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Grupo Ashta has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 21:29, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
The recent edit you made to Fame Has A Price constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 21:32, 2 February 2008 (UTC))
[edit] Speedy deletion of Fame Has A Price
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Fame Has A Price, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 13:31, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Amor Comprado theme song
I've removed the Amor Comprado theme song section as unreferenced, and request that it not be re-added without one. While I recognize that other portions of the article are also unreferenced, I'm particularly concerned by the way that you've posted varying songs and artists as the theme, all unreferenced, in addition to asking if some were correct at the Reference Desk. In short, barring a reference, I think the section has consisted solely of guesswork, which isn't suitable. — Lomn 19:55, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] No more fictional soap opera stuff
Eric, no more posting about your fictional soap opera. It is not appropriate for Wikipedia. Should this instruction be ignored, the only remaining alternative is a topic ban enforceable by blocking. This has been patiently explained several times and there's no possible further excuse for you to fail to understand. — Lomn 01:41, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] March 2008
Eric, several times on your talk page people have requested that you stop adding frivolous, fictional questions to the Reference Desk that only waste others' time. Others have provided many links to pages that inform what qualifies for inclusion in Wikipedia and what is considered appropriate for deletion. Yet, you continue to pursue a course of action that is not appropriate for Wikipedia. Please understand that such edits are considered Vandalism. The community has given you the benefit of the doubt multiple times but this edit of yours makes it clear that you are making bad-faith edits. You are not attempting to add legitimate value to Wikipedia, but instead making edits that you know are misleading. You do make some helpful edits, but that does not validate the intentional bad-faith edits that you also make. Please cease from making non-constructive edits. Those edits are vandalism. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SWAdair | Talk 06:43, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] What I Said About My articles Being My Business
I know I said that my articles are my business, but I wanted the whole world to know about my articles that I put into the computer on Wikipedia because whatever happens in My Beloved Girlfriend, I want the entire world to know about it. That's why I always talk about my soap opera 24/7/365. Ericthebrainiac (talk) 23:59, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Proposed Deletion for Talk:Ericthebrainiac
A tag has been placed on Talk:Ericthebrainiac, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a talk page of a nonexistent page. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Ouzo (talk) 14:45, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Reference Desk 3/25/2008
Please do not add useless contributions to the Reference Desks. If you do not know the answer to somebody's question, there is no reason to say anything. Your edits have been removed. --LarryMac | Talk 20:32, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
- And please do not talk to your IP sockpuppet, as you did in "Writing about a story I wrote". --Tagishsimon (talk) 21:31, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Alma de Hierro
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Alma de Hierro, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Alma de Hierro. —BradV 16:09, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Thank you
Thank you for the birthday wishes. SWAdair | Talk 03:02, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Brierdale, Florida's Television Industry
As of 2008, how many English language and Spanish language television series are currently made and and filmed in Brierdale, Florida? Ericthebrainiac (talk) 22:48, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Edit summaries
Hi Eric,
I've noticed you've got a particular method of edit summaries, generally "*/pagename/*". I wanted to let you know that they're entirely unnecessary if you don't want to be typing that out all the time. What you've probably seen are the autogenerated summaries of the form "/*text here*/" (note the reversal of * and /), which create a link to the relevant subsection of the page -- for instance, this edit includes a summary of "/*Edit summaries*/" that results in a link to User talk:Ericthebrainiac#Edit summaries. These functional ones are always autogenerated for you, which allows you to then append a summary describing what the edit is (rather than where the edit is) -- again in this case, a summary of "new section" is appended. Hope this helps explain that rather arcane notation you've been painstakingly emulating. — Lomn 21:14, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Excuse me...
But why you modified my user page, noting that I was adopted by you? When that happened? --Bolt (Talk) 16:30, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Adoption template
I removed the adoption template from your userpage, since it wasn't being displayed properly. If you are still seeking to be adopted, add the following code to your userpage: {{subst:dated adoptme}}. Cheers, xenocidic (talk) 15:02, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] May 2008
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Jonathan Lavery. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Adam Chandler. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Ouzo (talk) 13:46, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Eric...
What's with this strange behavior you having? I asked you a question, you din't answered. Your contributions and summaries are a little strange, and you pay too much attention to your user page... --Bolt (Talk) 13:06, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Ouzo was right. Trying to understand your answer gave me a headache. Talking to you was probably a mistake, but it was necessary. After all, you touched my userpage without asking. I shall give you benefit of the doubt about the way you behave, thinking that maybe the English language is not your natural language (is not mine either). --Bolt (Talk) 20:23, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Passions
Excuse me, but I have no idea what you are talking about. Perhaps you should go to someone who know more about that subject. Basketball110 My story/Tell me yours 00:32, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
- If it's notable, yes. Basketball110 My story/Tell me yours 23:49, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- Because Basketball110 is apparently unaware of what you're asking, let me be clear: NO. There is no appropriate place on Wikipedia for your soap operas or any related content. — Lomn 23:57, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- I think you are mistaking me for somebody. I don't watch "Passions." Lomn, you're right, I'm clueless. Could either of you explain what is going on? Basketball110 My story/Tell me yours 00:12, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, I have no idea what you mean, or what the answer is. Please ask someone who atleast knows what you mean. Basketball110 My story/Tell me yours 01:12, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- I think you are mistaking me for somebody. I don't watch "Passions." Lomn, you're right, I'm clueless. Could either of you explain what is going on? Basketball110 My story/Tell me yours 00:12, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Because Basketball110 is apparently unaware of what you're asking, let me be clear: NO. There is no appropriate place on Wikipedia for your soap operas or any related content. — Lomn 23:57, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Sorry...
But it is really not necessary. That's what the networks websites are for! We aren't TV Guide. --Bolt (Talk) 15:24, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Primetime
Why have you been asking for user:Primetime to be unbanned? You haven't posted any explanation that I can find. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 01:32, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of El Sueno del Siempre
I have nominated El Sueno del Siempre, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/El Sueno del Siempre. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. --Ouzo (talk) 05:49, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
- This isn't the place to write about things that doesn't exist. It's an encyclopedia. --Bolt (Talk) 13:33, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with El Sueno del Siempre. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you.--Ouzo (talk) 14:14, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with El Sueno del Siempre, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Ouzo (talk) 19:01, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- Also, just because you put a protection template on an article doesn't mean that article is protected from editing. --Ouzo (talk) 19:03, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Hoaxes
Please do not create hoaxes. Cease and desist from introducing misinformation into Wikipedia if you are attempting to test our ability to detect and remove it. This has been done before, with universally negative results. Hoaxes are marked for deletion shortly after they are created. Kindly — do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia, and then to check to see how long they have been in place and, if possible, correct them. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia policy to learn more about this project and how you can make a positive impact. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 08:54, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Page protection
Just to let you know, adding {{sprotected}} or {{protected}} to a page is only a means for an admin to notify users that a page is protected. This does not actually confer protection to the article. If you need help protecting a page, please contact an admin or request it. Thanks! Stifle (talk) 08:57, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Minor edits
Please remember to mark your edits as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.' Thank you. Stifle (talk) 09:04, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
{{uw-block3}}
{{Unblock|I just write what is on my mind for the day, week or year. Plus, I do not 'abuse' editing privileges. When I see something that isn't right by my standards, I usually correct that article}}
[edit] ANI discussion
Hello, Ericthebrainiac. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Yours, Stifle (talk) 14:17, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Here's the specific section. I assume the "about what?" below is in reference to this -- Eric, it regards your editing habits and the suitability of your contributions to Wikipedia. — Lomn 14:32, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
About what ?Sobre Qué?
-
-
- Why did you remove your signature from this? Gwen Gale (talk) 18:05, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
-
[edit] Minor edits
Apart from your intriguing edit summaries (I assume that you started doing that whe you saw an autogenerated one when you edited a section somewhere), I noticed that you mark most of your edits when minor. This generally isn't considered good etiquette, since minor edits often get overlooked by someone who's going through histories; it is a generally accepted standard that minor edits are things that only change grammer/punctuation or rearrange text, not adding it or removing it (with the possible exception of clear vandalism). Celarnor Talk to me 17:38, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Why not try being a Wikipedia:WikiGnome instead
You left the following message on my talk page. I had thought it might have been a mistake, but your history indicates troll activity. This is not appreciated. Lisa4edit (talk) 18:18, 15 May 2008 (UTC) Don't Forget
Don't forget to keep me posted on what happens on Passions because I need to know what is going to happen on the soap opera. Ericthebrainiac (talk) 17:15, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Your post-block edits
I've just undone your edit to Magneto (band). To repeat what Stifle told you on May 14th, just adding the template does not protect the page. If you need help protecting a page, please contact an admin or request it.
I also noticed that you left a message on a user page - User:Fast - rather than a talk page. Messages should really go on the user's talk page.
I've also reverted another of your edits from a while ago [2] where your text was:
If this is a translation of the first sentence of the synopsis at [3] then I would translate it as:
-
- Montserrat is certain that her habit of spying on her attractive next-door neighbor Juan José (a notorious womanizer) is simple curiosity, because the person she is in love with is her fiancé, Victor.
I think costumbre de espiar means a habit of spying rather than "spy costume", and there's no need to individually link the words. Ttwaring (talk) 19:12, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Reply
Depends mate. On Wikipedia we go by a standard of Notability if the story is not notable then no you are not allowed to mention them in the main space in any articles. It is only really notable if it has been published by a widely known publisher, has sold a lot of copies and has been mentioned by several high profile sources or reliable sources in general. Even then because you wrote the story you are not allowed to make or edit that article because of Conflict of Interest and Point of view issues. But if you are willing to let some one else write the article then you should be fine. But if you mean like to talk to other people about it. Yeah that is fine. Just do not talk often here as this is not a blog. Conversations are allowed..but it is highly suggested that if you have a huge conversation that you go to email or AIM. I hope I could help you out mate. If you more questions on this I am willing to answer them. Rgoodermote 18:00, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
- To pull out the key point, Eric, I'll quote from the above:
- no you are not allowed to mention them in the main space in any articles
- It's unpublished non-notable trivia, and there is no appropriate place on Wikipedia for it. — Lomn 19:05, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] ANI Discussion (part 2)
I've reintroduced discussion over your edits and have explained why here: Wikipedia:Administrators_noticeboard/Incidents#Ericthebrainiac. --Ouzo (talk) 14:09, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Blocked
I've blocked you for one week, for engaging in the same problematic behaviors you've been talked to about before. Specifically, this behavior includes things like misusing talk pages to talk about your own work, rather than discussing how to improve the article. Please take some time to learn what Wikipedia is about if you're going to continue editing here. Friday (talk) 14:31, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Specifically: What Wikipedia is not. Even more specifically: What Wikipedia is not: a publisher of original thought. --Ouzo (talk) 14:46, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Not Caring What Anybody Says about "My Beloved Girlfriend"
I have never gave a (double expletive) about what anyone says just as long as I know that what happens on my story is what I write about on Wikipedia. Ericthebrainiac (talk) 22:36, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- No. You may not write about your stories on Wikipedia. Doing so will result in further blocks and possibly a permanent ban. If you need an outlet to write about your stories, why not try blogger.com? — Lomn 17:27, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Seeing Vickie Guerrero Fired
I would like to see Vickie Guerrero fired by Mr. McMahon because I think that she has been abusing her role as General Manager of WWE SmackDown. Ericthebrainiac (talk) 21:57, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
And I would LOVE to see Teddy Long back as General Manager of SmackDown. Ericthebrainiac (talk) 21:59, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks for the Blogger.com suggestion
Thanks x 1,000,000 for the Blogger.com suggestion. Ericthebrainiac (talk) 23:28, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
I don't know why I didn't think of that before. Ericthebrainiac (talk) 23:28, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
