Talk:Episode 210

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Episode 210 has been listed as one of the Arts good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
Article milestones Date Process Result February 18, 2008 Peer review Reviewed March 1, 2008 Good article nominee Listed May 18, 2008 Good article reassessment Kept Current Status: Good article

	Comedy Portal This article is within the scope of the Comedy WikiProject, which collaborates on articles related to comedy, comics, comedians, comedy movies, and the like. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.

	Television Portal This article is part of WikiProject Television, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to television programs and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

A request has been made for this article to be copyedited by the League of Copyeditors. The progress of its reviewers is recorded below. The League is always in need of editors with a good grasp of English to review articles. Visit the Project page if you are interested in helping. Add comments Copyedited by Gprince007 (talk) – 15:49, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] GA review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Could the lead be expanded?

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   There are some slight POV issues. If you could go through and neutralize it a bit, it would be much better

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

For the most part, the article is good. However, the writing needs a little work in some areas, and there are slight POV issues as well. Until these isses are adderessed, I've put the article On-hold. Thank you for your work in improving this article thus far, and good luck in improving it to GA status. Juliancolton ^{The storm still blows...} 19:31, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, first, During the flashback sequences featuring Jack and C.C. trying to arrange meetings while C.C. is at work, it appears the characters are appearing on a fictional television channel named G-Span, an obvious reference to C-Span. is not neutral. "An obvious reference to..." is a POV. Also, the first sentence is awkward. Juliancolton ^{The storm still blows...} 01:34, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

It's starting to look better, and it's almost there. I think a final copyedit would do it. Julian^{(Leap Day 2008)} 22:45, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

It has been improved since I first reviwed it, and it now passes GA.

[edit] Ratings section

The ratings section states that it was up against many television serial's repeats or second-halfs. I feel that its not valid to compare a half hour episode to second half of an one-hour episode....so i deleted the sentence and moved the ratings sentence to previous section. Gprince007 (talk) 15:31, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Page name

This page needs to be moved: Episode 210 is not a good title for the tenth episode of the second season of 30 Rock. Can someone suggest a more descriptive title? Geometry guy 19:44, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Wait till the DVD comes out and see what they list it as. If it's "Untitled", maybe go with Untitled (30 Rock)? Not sure till then. —97198 talk 05:23, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

I'd be more inclined to be upfront about it with a title like "Episode 10 (30 Rock, season 2)" or even "30 Rock, season 2, episode 10". Geometry guy 14:58, 18 May 2008 (UTC)