Talk:Emperor Taizong's campaign against Goguryeo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject China, a project to improve all China-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other China-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.

Start

This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. (add comments)

華

This article is maintained by the Chinese history workgroup.

More information about this article...

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a project to build and improve articles related to Korea. We invite you to join the project and contribute to the discussion.
	Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. Please help us improve this article.
	???	This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the importance scale.

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.

Start

This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

Additional information and associated task forces:

	This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: criterion not met
Associated task forces (nations and regions):
	Chinese military history task force
	Korean military history task force

[edit] Korean pronounciations and Chinese POV

This article is well-balanced overall. However, there are a few parts where I would have to say there was some Chinese POV, such as suggesting that Yeon Gaesomun was "arrogant" in his treatment to the Tang emissaries. Perhaps taking words that express personal opinion out of the article. Also, Yeon Gaesomun was not a magniji, but a Dae Magniji. --Kprideboi (talk) 19:42, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

I am open to alternative wording as well any help you can provide on Korean names. However, it should be noted that, assuming that you are complaining about some of the Korean names already in the article that are in Revised Romanization, WP:MOS-KO calls for the use of Revised Romanization when it comes to historical articles. --Nlu (talk) 22:59, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Other articles/sources state 10-20,000 Tang soldiers were killed during the Seige of Ansi, would anyone oppose me changing the figure to 12-22,000 Tang dead? Jegal (talk) 17:44, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

No opposition as long as the sources are cited. I am personally skeptical of the 2,000 figure given by Chinese sources (which, I might add, was also adopted by the Samguk Sagi), given that Emperor Taizong himself had been in battles that singly had much more than that killed and probably wouldn't have considered 2,000 deaths a large figure, although, of course, in his middle age (he did not live to what we would consider to be old age) he might be viewing human casualties much more seriously than when he was young. It should also be noted, however, that it was said that he personally read the names of the dead at a ceremony. 20,000 names would be much harder to read for him personally than 2,000, although definitely not impossible. --Nlu (talk) 07:21, 21 February 2008 (UTC)