Talk:Emily Deschanel
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Stub | This article has been rated as stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
Question: does anyone know where i can contact her??? jw. thanks
Her DOB given is not the oe listed at IMDb. Is there a source for the one stated here? -R. fiend 17:27, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
TV.com had that one.
http://www.tv.com/emily-deschanel/person/107254/biography.html
IMDB's is quite different, now I'm confused.
TotalTommyTerror 17:29, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
Can somebody get the copyright information behind the image of Emily Deschanel which was recently removed?
69.138.160.180 02:20, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
Guess I'm wrong about it. That TV.com article even contradicts the birthdate further down. And most of what I see Googling it turns up the Jan 4, 1978 one. I'll change it back. My bad. TotalTommyTerror 17:35, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] patronymists?
What is that? Is that a misspelling?
[edit] new better image
why cant i put an image of her that is from imdb but actually taken from wire image? Dioxholster (talk) 01:39, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- It's a matter of copyright, and Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Read WP:NFC and WP:C. Also note that claiming fair-use for a copyrighted image of a living person is not permitted by Wikipedia on that person's bio page. Ward3001 (talk) 01:48, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
what if i got it from imdb photo place. not sure if its licensed there, but at the time it was obtainable, not at the moment though. i got the pic from jan 20 2008 and it had vespa as the name, who i think is the photographer. which was something like this: EmilyDesch_Vespa_7744721_400.jpg thats all i know about the image. obviously the name implies that it can be reused. Dioxholster (talk) 16:30, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, but no. Everything on IMDb is copyrighted. In fact, you must assume that any image is copyrighted unless it specifically states otherwise. About the only way to get an acceptable image in a case like this is if you take it yourself or you get permission from the copyright holder.
- "obviously the name implies that it can be reused": Certainly not obvious to me. There's nothing in the name "EmilyDesch_Vespa_7744721_400.jpg" that says it can be reused. Ward3001 (talk) 17:07, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
