Talk:Edmund Gettier
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is supported by the Science and academia work group. | ||
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details. | ||||||||||||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. | ||||||||||||
| High | This article has been rated as high-importance on the importance scale. | ||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Excellent paper by Professor Gettier! Say farewell to epistemology in the 'analytic' tradition'.
- Gettier's paper was hardly the end of epistemology in analytic philosophy. Evercat 11:21, 16 May 2004 (UTC)
And they continue to waste their time. Scientists and people who try to acquire knowledge in everyday life ignore this literature.
- Of course. Evercat 14:08, 19 May 2004 (UTC)
'The controversial Norman Malcolm?' What's that supposed to mean?
[edit] WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 03:57, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Categories: Biography articles with listas parameter | Biography articles of living people | Science and academia work group articles | Start-Class biography (science and academia) articles | Mid-priority biography (science and academia) articles | Start-Class biography articles | High-importance Philosophy articles | Start-Class epistemology articles | High-importance epistemology articles | Epistemology task force articles | Start-Class philosopher articles | High-importance philosopher articles | Philosophers task force articles | Start-Class Philosophy articles
