Wikipedia:Editor Review/NOVO-REI

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] User:NOVO-REI

NOVO-REI (talk · contribs) Hi, I haven't editted for this site for much time, but after reviewing a former user today, and haaving to oppose a rather hasty RfA this particularly person pulled up - I feel that I may have had some type of faults (incivil behavior) within Wikipedia. Please review my contributions, reactions with other users and my translation ability and give me feedback. I want it to be known that I have tried to edit to the best of my ability, and will continue to do so for however long it will take me to finish my time with the project.

Although I don't plan on staying permanently, me doing so is truly a possibility from what I have already done. I don't have so many edits, so any practical review won't wear anyone out. Thanks NOVO-REI 21:06, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Reviews

• Without commenting on anything else, I'd first suggest making a userpage, even if it's just a redirect to your talk page. A red name looks sort of unprofessional, and anyone doing RC patrol or looking at a watchlist will generally trust people with userpages over people without and anons. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 21:35, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

True, I just held back on making one because I don't consider myself - as crazy as this sounds - an "important" user yet, and I think making one with haste would be a little arrogant. But seeing that it is not, I will definitely make one in the near future. Thanks. NOVO-REI 21:37, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

• This user seems good to me. FellowWikipedian 02:25, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

I made one! Now I am going to sleep! Oh, it's kinda ugly, so any decors can do there magic :-) And thanks for the kind comment FW. NOVO-REI 03:59, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

• You have a particularly impressive track record for a new user. Military history of Brazil and Pernambucan Revolt are some good articles from you. And good work on getting two DYKs in such a short time! The only dissapointing part was your remark in your edit here where you say you would leave after the 1000th edit. Why so, may I ask? -- thunderboltz^{a.k.a.Deepu Joseph |TALK}

14:24, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Well, I said 10,000 - and this was first edit here. You should note that I haven't conformed to it "tic for tac" so I doubt I will leave then. I guess I don't want to spend too much time here - but if I say so myself, this place is very addictive. 16:40, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Hehe, definitely. See how much you score on Wikipediholic Test test. -- thunderboltz^{a.k.a.Deepu Joseph |TALK}09:25, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Comments

• See this user's edit history with Interiot's tool and edit summary usage (Warning:Both tools have stopped updating and the edit counts are way off. Please consider using Flcelloguy's Tool or Interiot's Tool 2)
• Icey's Tabular Individual Statistics. Icey 19:38, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Questions

1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

   AnswerNone now, NOVO-REI 21:42, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

   AnswerNone now, NOVO-REI 21:42, 7 July 2006 (UTC)