ebooksgratis.com

See also ebooksgratis.com: no banners, no cookies, totally FREE.

CLASSICISTRANIERI HOME PAGE - YOUTUBE CHANNEL
Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Terms and Conditions
Talk:Earth jurisprudence - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Talk:Earth jurisprudence

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on 2007-04-05. The result of the discussion was keep.
⚖
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance assessment on the assessment scale.
Socrates This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale.

Find sources: Earth jurisprudencenews, books, scholar

[edit] Editing help

ENCYCLOPAEDIC STYLE: Can anyone advise me how to improve this new article that I have just made? The first editor's message posted there reads, This article or section reads like a personal reflection or essay and may require cleanup. Please improve this article by rewriting this article or section in an encyclopaedic style. --Lesley Fairbairn 15:03, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

BUZZWORDS: One of the inherent problems here is that this is a new field so we do not have a lot of references and it is difficult not to use what they call buzz words. Can anyone advise me on how to get round the second editor's message posted on this article, which reads, This article or section appears to contain a large number of buzzwords and may require cleanup. Please help rewrite this article to make it more concrete and meaningful, removing tautologies, obvious statements and excessive abstraction. --Lesley Fairbairn 15:03, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi Lesley, Please see your talk page for my message. --killing sparrows 07:52, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] re: Improvements to this article

Anyone interested in helping to improve this article can see what is being done at User talk:Killing sparrows/Earth jurisprudence


aa - ab - af - ak - als - am - an - ang - ar - arc - as - ast - av - ay - az - ba - bar - bat_smg - bcl - be - be_x_old - bg - bh - bi - bm - bn - bo - bpy - br - bs - bug - bxr - ca - cbk_zam - cdo - ce - ceb - ch - cho - chr - chy - co - cr - crh - cs - csb - cu - cv - cy - da - de - diq - dsb - dv - dz - ee - el - eml - en - eo - es - et - eu - ext - fa - ff - fi - fiu_vro - fj - fo - fr - frp - fur - fy - ga - gan - gd - gl - glk - gn - got - gu - gv - ha - hak - haw - he - hi - hif - ho - hr - hsb - ht - hu - hy - hz - ia - id - ie - ig - ii - ik - ilo - io - is - it - iu - ja - jbo - jv - ka - kaa - kab - kg - ki - kj - kk - kl - km - kn - ko - kr - ks - ksh - ku - kv - kw - ky - la - lad - lb - lbe - lg - li - lij - lmo - ln - lo - lt - lv - map_bms - mdf - mg - mh - mi - mk - ml - mn - mo - mr - mt - mus - my - myv - mzn - na - nah - nap - nds - nds_nl - ne - new - ng - nl - nn - no - nov - nrm - nv - ny - oc - om - or - os - pa - pag - pam - pap - pdc - pi - pih - pl - pms - ps - pt - qu - quality - rm - rmy - rn - ro - roa_rup - roa_tara - ru - rw - sa - sah - sc - scn - sco - sd - se - sg - sh - si - simple - sk - sl - sm - sn - so - sr - srn - ss - st - stq - su - sv - sw - szl - ta - te - tet - tg - th - ti - tk - tl - tlh - tn - to - tpi - tr - ts - tt - tum - tw - ty - udm - ug - uk - ur - uz - ve - vec - vi - vls - vo - wa - war - wo - wuu - xal - xh - yi - yo - za - zea - zh - zh_classical - zh_min_nan - zh_yue - zu -