Talk:Doreen Knatchbull, Baroness Brabourne

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage.

	Ireland Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Ireland on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the priority scale.

[edit] Proposed merge

There is noting of note here that could not be contained within the Louis Mountbatten, 1st Earl Mountbatten of Burma article. Anyone agree/disagree?--Vintagekits 16:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Could definitely do with merging somewhere. One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 23:19, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

In step, I see. --Counter-revolutionary 00:07, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

In step like the AfD you quoted the other week! good one!--Vintagekits 00:08, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

These editors consistently vote together on the same issues and show severe anti-British views. I believe this nomination is in bad faith. Their edit histories show this.--Counter-revolutionary 00:10, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Its not even nominated yet! lol! --Vintagekits 00:12, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Where did I see it was? --Counter-revolutionary 00:18, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

In your last post - "I believe this nomination is in bad faith." If I was showing "severe anti-British views" as you say then I would be looking to delete this article - I am not it should be a merge and redirect for the fact that it adds nothing other than it contained already within Dandruffs article.--Vintagekits 09:00, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Oh, shut up, you know perfectly well what I meant. This article would easily pass WP notability, especially if, instead of deleting articles, you researched them! --Counter-revolutionary 09:02, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

You have been remind on countless occasions about WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA. I am getting pretty tired of your attacks to be honest. Please keep a civil tone and dont tell other edits to "shut up". As the article stands it adds nothing. I am going to AfD it.--Vintagekits 09:05, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

...and I'm growing quite tired of you also. Do what you like. --Counter-revolutionary 11:13, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

I challenge you to provide just one cast-iron example of me showing "severe anti-British views", otherwise I respectfully suggest you retract your comment and refrain from making it in future. One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 12:32, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Merge part 2

Merge with Michael Knatchbull, 5th Baron Brabourne. That article already contains 95% of the information in this one, and the remaining 5% can easily be added. One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 12:11, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Agree.--Vintagekits 17:05, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Disagree. - Kittybrewster (talk) 09:13, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Comment. If this article can be expanded with verifiable information then it should remain unmerged. Although I'm no expert, I would guess that it could be expended. Greenshed 22:43, 7 May 2007 (UTC)