Talk:Don Harlow

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.
	This article is supported by the Science and academia work group.

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Constructed languages, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, and easy-to-use resource about constructed languages, aka conlangs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. If listing this article for deletion or if there is an active edit war, please post a note here.	Constructed languages Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the class scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Esperanto task force.

[edit] Removed cleanup template

I removed the cleanup template after the following exchange with Admrb♉ltz:

I'm curious to know why you tagged the Don Harlow stub for cleanup. I didn't create the article and have no vested interest in it, I'm just curious. I've been here a bit too long to call myself a newbie, but the amount of time I'm able to spend editing Wikipedia articles is limited, so I often feel like I'm new even though I'm not. It seems like a perfectly good stub to me, and there were no comments on the talk page to enlighten me (in fact, there is no talk page at all). As I said, my dander's not up or anything, I'm just curious. —CKA3KA (Skazka) 22:16, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

See the dif from when I added it -- it not realy encyclopedic, and had 2 images that were deleted shortly after I tagged it. Admrb♉ltz (T | C)

Thanks. That clears things up for me nicely. The old version was indeed very much in need of cleanup. Does the cleanup template need to be removed, now? If so, I'll be happy to do it—or you can. Lemmeknow. —CKA3KA (Skazka) 22:49, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

I think it is safe to remove it, and you can go ahead and do it; I am at work :p Admrb♉ltz (T | C) 22:50, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

—CKA3KA (Skazka) 23:14, 27 March 2006 (UTC)