User talk:Dlyons493/TestArchive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Did you know...

...that you're famous? You're right down near the bottom of the page I indicated, but the entire article is more than worth a read. Cheers : ) thepromenader 10:34, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eduardo Reck Miranda (2nd nomination)

Hi. Did you mean to remove my comment in this edit? — Kaustuv Chaudhuri 00:51, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eduardo Reck Miranda (2nd nomination)

Hi. Did you mean to remove my comment in this edit? — Kaustuv Chaudhuri 00:51, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Dagda's Cauldron

Hi, I think just a bit of re-arrangement so that the article starts like, The Dagda's Cauldron is..... I suppose I could have done it myself, now you mention it, but I notice you started the article, so maybe you would want do it? Arcturus 23:08, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] How do you un-nominate an AFD?

Cheryl Kaye Tardif is now improved, the author herself is now working toward the goal of creating a good article, I believe she has come a long way towards that and has made some valid points on her User talk page. I am willing to continue working with her and now need to know how to go about possibly closing the AFD. If you know could you enlighten me? Thanx ←ScoPhreek→ 20:32, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

I've now been working pretty closely with the author, what else would you suggest that we do to the article? (Constructive critisism please) She may be nonnotable in our areas but apparently is making a name for herself in Canada, so I guess the question is, "Is she a notable person in Canada?" I have no idea, but, I do know that there are articles on a lot less notable people here at wikipedia and they get to stay so ... (shrug) ←ScoPhreek→ 03:22, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] How do you un-nominate an AFD?

Cheryl Kaye Tardif is now improved, the author herself is now working toward the goal of creating a good article, I believe she has come a long way towards that and has made some valid points on her User talk page. I am willing to continue working with her and now need to know how to go about possibly closing the AFD. If you know could you enlighten me? Thanx ←ScoPhreek→ 20:32, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

I've now been working pretty closely with the author, what else would you suggest that we do to the article? (Constructive critisism please) She may be nonnotable in our areas but apparently is making a name for herself in Canada, so I guess the question is, "Is she a notable person in Canada?" I have no idea, but, I do know that there are articles on a lot less notable people here at wikipedia and they get to stay so ... (shrug) ←ScoPhreek→ 03:22, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Linda Trimble

Hi. Not sure if you are watching the debate but I think you might want to reconsider your vote on the AfD for Linda Trimble. There is actually only one book and not five which she has authored. Thanks. Pascal.Tesson 13:50, 12 August 2006 (UTC) No it is of course the right Linda Trimble! The problem, as I explained on the AfD page, is that she is not the author but the editor of those books. Which is a very very different thing. Cheers. Pascal.Tesson 14:40, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chiricheppu

Good thing that you put this up for deletion. S.Jithesh who is the editor of that magazine has created an article for himself and is on a campaign put up his name in various lists. I don't think he is notable and my queries to other Malayalam editors got similar responses (Wikipedia_talk:Notice_board_for_India-related_topics/Kerala#S.Jithesh and this. )

This person or his suspected sock/meat puppets have been adding his name everywhere - see [1], [2], [3]), removing posts questioning his notability ( [4], [5]) and arguing for him ([6]).

IMO, this looks a delete now. I'll wait for other people's comments before adding mine, and if this gets deleted, I will nominate S. Jithesh too. I won't be surprised if many 'new' editors appear to comment on this Afd. Tintin (talk) 06:02, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Chiricheppu

I dunno, heh. :) From an RC patrol perspective, they haven't been too much of a problem, just yet. I'm going to watchlist the pages of everyone involved, which should probably reduce the problems even further still. At least one of them's already been blocked, if any others prove to be persistent vandals or such, I suspect they will, as well. If there's any vandalism, threats, or any such thing I'm missing, feel free to let me know. Luna Santin 21:43, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

I don't think there's any proof that they're socks. IMO, they're colleagues of the Adv sreekumar guy, adn he's requested them to help out. They haven't done anything blockable apart from that; just a few minor cases of vandalism. --May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 10:35, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Chiricheppu

dont try to show personal vendetta. if you have the right to delete my own created articles i too have the right to do it. you and your tin tin are trying to defame others. you are not doing editing. you are doing nuisance to others. we know who are you. you people are mere tools of some nasty politicians who are trying to defame chiricheppu.we too edit you and tintin mercilessly.

Goodness me. No punctuation, terrible grammar. "you have misleaded by", "we know who are you", "we too edit you and tintin mercilessly." ! An IAS officer who can't write English ?! Or is it just possible that you are not who you claim to be ? Tintin (talk) 04:51, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Chiricheppu

I dunno, heh. :) From an RC patrol perspective, they haven't been too much of a problem, just yet. I'm going to watchlist the pages of everyone involved, which should probably reduce the problems even further still. At least one of them's already been blocked, if any others prove to be persistent vandals or such, I suspect they will, as well. If there's any vandalism, threats, or any such thing I'm missing, feel free to let me know. Luna Santin 21:43, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

I don't think there's any proof that they're socks. IMO, they're colleagues of the Adv sreekumar guy, adn he's requested them to help out. They haven't done anything blockable apart from that; just a few minor cases of vandalism. --May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 10:35, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:150px-Armes sundgau.gif listed for deletion

[edit] My opinion

(I am not sure whether this is a right place to give all these

[edit] To Mr.P.C.Sanalkumar I.A.S, the advocate and other supporters of the magazine

Please note that no one is saying anything bad about Chiricheppu or Mr.Jithesh Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and they have few guidelines for them. They are trying to implement this. There is no need to get unduly worried. You can perhaps scan few pages of the magazine like the cover page, the page showing the details of the Editor, Publisher etc, the page showing the Registration number (registered as a newspaper under so and so) and upload that http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Upload

[edit] To others

• Can you change the opinion after you get the images and if they are satisfactory???
• Moreover please note that the media in Europe and America (as well as the media in Delhi and Bombay) are different from the Media in Kerala. A person may get less than 5 % of the coverage in media, yet he will be a very notable personality

1. Most of the press coverage is by the Local Media in Languages like Hindi, Tamil, Malayalam and Bengali
2. Such media reports do not have an online edition
3. If if there is an online edition, most of the reports are not in Unicode, but use their own fonts and not searchable
4. Even many of the English papers are behind a subscription and hence not retrievable

• Moreover, notability is an subjective phenomenon. To me (a doctor) William Shockley, John Bardeen and Walter Brattain are not notable where as Harrison and Pastuer are notable. To an electrical engineer, it may be other wise. In such a context, it will be best if the notability is decided by the editors from the concerned field. (ie) If the AFD debate is regarding a political party of Bengal [7] it will be non notable for those from France and even to those from Kerala. What is the use of everyone visiting the page and adding delete ??? Similarly, in this case, I think it is better to get the opinion of few guys who the habit of reading papers and books published in local language (which unfortunately many wikipedians don't have) and then decide
• Any way, unless it is a spam link, I don't think that there is anything wrong in keeping an article when there is a doubt (If in doubt, keep)Doctor Bruno 16:27, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

According to the Official Government of India website [8] this is a magazine published from Adoor. Hence that settles the verifiability part. The only question that remains is Notability.Doctor Bruno 16:38, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

I have given my revised opinion at the article's AFD page. Please have a look and decideDoctor Bruno 10:45, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] My opinion

(I am not sure whether this is a right place to give all these

[edit] To Mr.P.C.Sanalkumar I.A.S, the advocate and other supporters of the magazine

Please note that no one is saying anything bad about Chiricheppu or Mr.Jithesh Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and they have few guidelines for them. They are trying to implement this. There is no need to get unduly worried. You can perhaps scan few pages of the magazine like the cover page, the page showing the details of the Editor, Publisher etc, the page showing the Registration number (registered as a newspaper under so and so) and upload that http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Upload

[edit] To others

• Can you change the opinion after you get the images and if they are satisfactory???
• Moreover please note that the media in Europe and America (as well as the media in Delhi and Bombay) are different from the Media in Kerala. A person may get less than 5 % of the coverage in media, yet he will be a very notable personality

1. Most of the press coverage is by the Local Media in Languages like Hindi, Tamil, Malayalam and Bengali
2. Such media reports do not have an online edition
3. If if there is an online edition, most of the reports are not in Unicode, but use their own fonts and not searchable
4. Even many of the English papers are behind a subscription and hence not retrievable

• Moreover, notability is an subjective phenomenon. To me (a doctor) William Shockley, John Bardeen and Walter Brattain are not notable where as Harrison and Pastuer are notable. To an electrical engineer, it may be other wise. In such a context, it will be best if the notability is decided by the editors from the concerned field. (ie) If the AFD debate is regarding a political party of Bengal [9] it will be non notable for those from France and even to those from Kerala. What is the use of everyone visiting the page and adding delete ??? Similarly, in this case, I think it is better to get the opinion of few guys who the habit of reading papers and books published in local language (which unfortunately many wikipedians don't have) and then decide
• Any way, unless it is a spam link, I don't think that there is anything wrong in keeping an article when there is a doubt (If in doubt, keep)Doctor Bruno 16:27, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

According to the Official Government of India website [10] this is a magazine published from Adoor. Hence that settles the verifiability part. The only question that remains is Notability.Doctor Bruno 16:38, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

I have given my revised opinion at the article's AFD page. Please have a look and decideDoctor Bruno 10:45, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tirlannon

Your choice of words regarding the Legacy of Tirlannon has offended me deeply. There is *no* vanity in the work I have set out to do. I have chosen the route of independent publication, because I find the methodology of the traditional press sickening. I have never once received a rejection letter for any of my submissions. I have chosen the route of independent publication at this time to protect my rights and interests.

It is not a vanity publication. It is not something I seek glory in. I haven't even published it under my real name. I do this because I have had a vision, and I wish to tell everyone who will hear what I have seen...

It was not even my choice to have a wikipedia entry added. It was one of my fans who wrote it up, on his own initiative.

Sage Tuvitor 12:42, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Reply:

Fair enough. Thanks for clarifying.

Sage Tuvitor 12:58, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ouster by Coup

I don't have the link, sorry. I still think it should be called something like "Leaders ousted from power by a coup." --Descendall 16:17, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Andrea di Robilant

Why did you notify ME? If you checked the discussion page, you should know I tried to have the article deleted for lack of notability, and badbio grounds... I had not even noted the copyvio. I'd like that article to be gone, and come back when the guy really has made a name for himself, and there's matter for a real article to be made. --Svartalf 17:08, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wolfgang Abendroth; Reinhard Opitz

Sir, if you feel able to rewrite both English entries in en.wikipedia.org, perhaps a look on these contributions might be useful: 1.1. Reinhard Opitz: Liberalismus - Faschismus - Integration; Edition in drei Bänden (Bd.1: Liberalismus - Integration, Bd.2: Faschismus; Bd.3: Die »Röhm-Affäre«). BdWi-Verlag, Marburg 2000, 1 450 pp.; 1.2. reviewed by Jean Cremet in: Jungle World 29. Maerz 2000 [[11]]; 2. Georg Biemann, Kinderbilder für einen Weggefährten: Zur Biographie des Publizisten and Politikwissenschaftlers Reinhard Opitz; in: Forum Wissenschaft, 1/1998, pp. 50-54 (a short biographical sketch); 3.1. Richard Albrecht, Reinhard Opitz´ These von der Bewußtseinsfalsifikation - 30 Jahre später; in: Topos. Internationale Beiträge zur dialektischen Theorie, Novembre 2005, No. 24, pp. 123-146; 3.2. the enlarged online-version, with English summary, is completely free of charge publ. by GRIN Verlag Munich, 2004 [[12]]; 3.3. the abridged version in: junge Welt, 26. Novembre 2004, pp. 10-11; 4.1. Richard Albrecht, „...denkt immer an den ´mittleren Funktionär´... Wolfgang Abendroth (2. Mai 1906 bis 15. September 1985); publ. by GRIN-Verlag Munich 2005, completely free of charge: [[13]]; 4.2. abridged printed version: Internationale wissenschaftliche Korrespondenz zur Geschichte der deutschen Arbeiterbewegung (iwk), 4/2004, pp. 465-487; 4.3. second printed version: Wolfgang Abendroth für Einsteiger und Fortgeschrittene, ed. Friedrich-Martin Balzer. CD-Rom; 2nd, enlarged ed.; Bonn: Pahl-Rugenstein, 2006 [ISBN 3-89144-371-4]. Aug. 23, 2006, M. Eser

[edit] Coimisiún na Gaeltachta

I started an article about the Coimisiún na Gaeltachta, but the article needs to be expanded. Since you mentioned the Commission in your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caoilfhionn Nic Pháidín, I thought you might be interested in expaning the article. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 04:15, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bload Bowl

I am trying to determine if this game is notable enough to keep. From what I can gather so far, I'd have to say no. But I am curious about the newspaper clippings. I'm not asking for you translate, but I would like to know if you could look over them and share with us whether there is evidence there that this is a widely-known sport in French Polynesia, and whether it is played at several universities there. Thankyou. Rohirok 23:46, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding your message

Hi, Do you have any links re Arturo Fuente and PucciMac? I can't find anything on the Web.Dlyons493 Talk 22:50, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Err...what are you talking about? Maybe you're talking to the wrong person...because I'm totally clueless. --Nishkid64 23:00, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit]  ????? ???????

You can count on me! :) Todor?Bozhinov 12:57, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

I wouldn't have done better in such circumstances, you've done a great job with saving the article! Todor?Bozhinov 13:34, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Talk:Triaria/De claris mulieribus

Copied from above Hi, This is the basic citation for the Boccaccio ref in the Triaria article. It would unbalance the article to include it in te article itself but putting it on Wikibooks makes the linking cumbersome. I initially put this on Talk:Triaria, but that's not really what talk pages are intended for. So I felt a sub-page was the neatest solution. Dlyons493 Talk 09:27, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

I understand your reasoning, but "cumbersome linking" is not a good reason to use this solution. You were probably not aware of this, but making subpages in main article space is not allowed (see Wikipedia:Subpages), and is supposed to be impossible anyway (not your fault that you could do something that is supposedly impossible). So I fear that you will have to link to some outside source anyway (wikibooks or another). Fram 09:36, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I have to CSD these per Fram. Could this not be included as a reference in small text at the bottom of the main article? Not sure what an alternative solution would be. Sorry. Let me know if you want it userfied -- Samir ???? 11:19, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ifti Elahi article

Thank you for the time you have spent verifying the Ifti Elahi article. This article needs tidying up but it is genunine and i would ask of you to rescue it from deletion. The opinions of both Kader AND Ifti are described through interviews and although badly written, they are NOT the personal rant of the writer. Could I ask you to study the article more closely and verify that this is true and rescue the article from deletion as i will put citations up in the next few days. Thank you in advance.

[edit] Adam

Hi, It's on Google Books [14] Dlyons493 Talk 12:30, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

That little ½ of a page in a book isn't enough for me to cancel the AFD but you might want to improve the article just in case. I can't read French. —Wknight94 (talk) 12:58, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Pooja Asamsakal

POoja asamsakal. Adv. P. R. Bijuchandran 12:47, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:SuzanneDoppelt.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SuzanneDoppelt.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok ? 06:03, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dlyons?

Dlyons, I'm really saddened to discover that you have — or are considering — leaving the project. If there is anything I can do, or if you'd like to talk, please send me an email from the link in the sidebar of my user page. Keep the door open for a return down the road; maybe your outlook will change. You'll always be welcome, that's for sure. Your work here has been tremendous, and has been impressing me ever since Biffeche, December 24. In case you haven't heard it enough, thank you. All the best ×Meegs 13:51, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject France

A proposal has been made for the above WikiProject at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals#France. Would you be interested in contributing to it? STTW (talk) 20:41, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Social activist

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Social activist, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and "Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day"). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Social activist. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Bytebear 07:44, 27 November 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Image:Sap01mh034440p.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sap01mh034440p.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 18:20, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] This is a automated to all bot operators

Please take a few moments and fill in the data for your bot on Wikipedia:Bots/Status Thank you Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 19:02, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Automated message to bot owners

As a result of discussion on the village pump and mailing list, bots are now allowed to edit up to 15 times per minute. The following is the new text regarding bot edit rates from Wikipedia:Bot Policy:

Until new bots are accepted they should wait 30-60 seconds between edits, so as to not clog the recent changes list and user watchlists. After being accepted and a bureaucrat has marked them as a bot, they can edit at a much faster pace. Bots doing non-urgent tasks should edit approximately once every ten seconds, while bots who would benefit from faster editing may edit approximately once every every four seconds.

Also, to eliminate the need to spam the bot talk pages, please add Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard to your watchlist. Future messages which affect bot owners will be posted there. Thank you. --Mets501 00:56, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Advertisements?

User:Redwolf24/FullArchive#User_Tyciol So I know this is a bit out of date, but where was it you thought I was advertising things? Tyciol 15:30, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Replaceable fair use Image:AnnePortugal.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:AnnePortugal.gif. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 08:30, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] C.Mulroney

I saw that you took time to vote on the Caroline Mulroney article a year ago. I am not canvassing for votes. I am just letting everyone who voted a year ago know that I have re-nominated it for deletion.DDD DDD 11:43, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:42MaMSaintRomainlePuy.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:42MaMSaintRomainlePuy.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)