User talk:Djith
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Archives
[edit] PMS Clan
Hi you left me a message under my IP, but as I'm unregistered and my IP is likely to change - i thought it best to write here instead - hope that's okay. :-)
You asked why I reverted your edit, well here is my explanation.
1. The PMS clan are not only American, this is wrong in your edit. (a minor point I know)
2. Your version includes this quote:
"PMS members compete in various competitions, but have not achieved notable accomplishments in these. They claim however, that their goal is to provide a safe and fun playing environment for other female gamers"
The goal of PMS clan is not to win events, this is not a claim - it is a fact. PMS clan have an open recruit for ANY female player. No judgement on skill is used the in the recruitment process. You have to regularly play games (and meet with the clan several times a week) but you do not have to be good. Consequentially PMS clan doesn't not win loads of events. Your article makes the focus on event scores and points out the lack of results. This is irrelevant to the clan. The clan exists to give a positive environment for female gamers.
3. The reverted article pointed all of this out and was referenced. It was ALREADY very recently rewritten to take accounts of other peoples issues and points. Your re-edit added no value to this, and seemed to be unnecessarily negative.
http://www.pmsclan.com/aboutus.html
Thanks - Cin :-) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.31.77.149 (talk) 19:26, 22 February 2007 (UTC).
- I have the feeling that PMS only wishes to tell half the story. It's bad enough that PMS members edit the PMS article (reeks of vanity), but they do not seem to be able to maintain a NPOV. For instance, the following claim: "PMS members compete in various co-ed competitions, and because of this have become well known as female gamers in a primarially male dominated industry." PMS is not well know for competing in competitions, because they have never performed well in any competition. With the exception of the CGI thing, which was an exhibition and was set up to ensure a female player would get a place in the final. The one reason why PMS is 'known' is because of a special on some TV channel. Nothing more, nothing less. Still the word competition is used twice in the article. If the focus is to be put on competition, tell the full story. Otherwise, don't tell anything at all.
- As per specific points: 1. PMS is an American organization, which makes it an American clan, no matter where their members come from. This is a standard convention used for any club (or clan in this case).
- 2. There is a difference between a fact and a claim. A fact is that grass is generally green. A claim would be that I like beer. See the difference? :)
- Right now, the article just seems overly positive, for a group which probably does not pass WP:BIO anyway. Just something to consider. -- Laurens Hoek 19:57, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
---It has already been discussed as WP:BIO and already passed. In the same way that you feel the current version is overly positive, I feel that your version is overly negative. Perhaps there is some neutral ground somewhere and the next edit can be one we both agree on. Thanks - Cin :-)
- Well I think it is best to remove the explicit notion of competing, since PMS is obviously not notable for its competitive achievements, as opposed to for instance SK Gaming or MeetYourMakers, who are top professionals in their field. The only 'achievement' of PMS would be that it is a large female gaming clan. But deeming that notable, would be discriminating by gender, since there are many large male gaming clans that are just as large, but will never be notable. We might as well add articles for every scouts group in the world if we go down that path ;) -- Laurens Hoek 11:12, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of WSVG
An editor has nominated WSVG, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Series of Video Games and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:49, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Team zEx
Re: your neutrality dispute tag. Could you please outline your rationale for that tag on the talk page, so that any and all concerned editors can begin dicussion on whether or not the article violates NPOV and how we can rectify that. I will gladly discuss with you any issues you might have, but you'd need to outline and explain your issues with the article. Please do so on the article talk space and not in either of our userspaces. // 3R1C 18:45, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Category:British electronic sports teams
Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Category:British electronic sports teams. It is considered vandalism. If you think an article should be deleted, please use deletion process, in stead of blanking the page. In this case, we're talkuing about a category which survived a CfD, so it's likely to survive any others. Od Mishehu 07:50, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Cpl world season.jpg
Hello, Djith. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Cpl world season.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Djith/WiP3. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 23:02, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Finals wt.gif
Hello, Djith. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Finals wt.gif) was found at the following location: User:Djith/WiP2. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 03:59, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Painkiller 03.jpg
Hello Djith, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Painkiller 03.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Djith/WiP2. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 04:01, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Cpl world season.jpg
 |
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Cpl world season.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:10, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Past CPL Winners
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Past CPL Winners, by ZBrannigan (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Past CPL Winners fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Past CPL Winners, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 17:57, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Past CPL Winners
Past CPL Winners, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Past CPL Winners satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Past CPL Winners and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Past CPL Winners during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Sancho 03:16, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cpl world season.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Cpl world season.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:06, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
