Talk:DJ Magazine

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject Rave      (Rated Start-Class) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rave, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to Rave, Rave music and other various aspects of rave culture. For more information, visit our project page. Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. WikiProject Electronic music      (Rated Start-Class) Electronic music Portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Electronic music, set up to organize and expand entries on Electronic music. Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. WikiProject Media (Rated Start-Class) Society Portal This article is part of WikiProject Media, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to media. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

[edit] Wow...

A very bad article indeed. Has almost no content at all except for a list and POV content about how renowned the magazine is. Very strange title (doubt if it should be called this way), and doesn't even have a lead introduction. Salaskan 20:12, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

POV flaws removed (where possible). --Buch 15:13, 3 October 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Usrbuchfeld (talk • contribs)

[edit] Top 100?

Do we really need the top 100 on this?

The Ronin 21:55, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Yup, this article *is* crappy as hell. I call deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.124.174.20 12:26, 4 May 2007 (talk • contribs)

I call improvement. SalaSkan 20:14, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Propose removal of Top 100. Why Top 100 for 2006 and not other years? Either have them all or none. Consider transfer of Top 100 to it's own article if DJ Mag Top 100 is (in itself) notable, or maybe, consider adding the each individual Top 100 accolade to each individual DJ's article (where they exist. --Buch 12:52, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

The top 100 area is very intrusive, difficult to read, and really goes against several sections in WP:NOT. I suggest shortening it to the top 20 for each year, and simply link to the site that the full list can be found. Thoughts? Ariel♥Gold 23:32, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Not fit for purpose

In the state that has been retrieved and expanded, this article is no longer fit for purpose. It is so subjective and so poorly referenced, it is now unusable and (it should be noted) it is factually unsafe. I propose deletion.--Buch 12:08, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

I have moderated the edit by IvoShandor somewhat. __meco 15:05, 7 October 2007 (UTC)