Distributed revision control
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. Please improve this article if you can. (November 2007) |
 |
This article or section seems to contain embedded lists that may require cleanup. To meet Wikipedia's style guidelines, please help improve this article by: removing items which are not notable, encyclopedic, or helpful from the list(s); incorporating appropriate items into the main body of the article; and discussing this issue on the talk page. |
 |
It has been suggested that this article or section be merged with revision control#Distributed revision control. (Discuss) |
Distributed revision control (or Distributed Version Control (Systems) (DVCS), or Decentralized Version Control) is a fairly recent innovation in software revision control. It provides some significant advantages over the more traditional centralized approach to revision control, and it has some defining characteristics that separate it from centralized systems. However, the line between distributed and centralized systems is graying in some regards, especially since DVCSs can be used in a "centralized mode".
Contents |
[edit] Vs Centralised
 |
This article or section may contain original research or unverified claims. Please improve the article by adding references. See the talk page for details. (January 2008) |
Comparisons are often made between
[edit] Differences
- Each developer does work on his own local repository.
- Working model epitomizes bazaar-style development in that anyone can create their own branch.
- Repositories are cloned by anyone, and are often cloned many times.
- There may be many "central" repositories.
- Access control lists are not employed. Instead code from disparate repositories are merged based on a web of trust, i.e., historical merit or quality of changes.
- Lieutenants are project members who have the power to dynamically decide which branches to merge.
- Network is not involved in most opererations.
- A separate set of "sync" operations are available for committing or receiving changes with remote repositories.
[edit] Advantages
- Allows users to work productively even when not connected to a network
- Makes most operations much faster since no network is involved
- Allows participation in projects without requiring permissions from project authorities, and thus arguably better fosters culture of meritocracy instead of requiring "committer" status.
- Allows private work, so you can use your revision control system even for early drafts you don't want to publish
- Avoids relying on a single physical machine. A server disk crash is a non-event with Distributed revision control
- Code migration into "pristine environment" can take a different route from developer to its final destination. e.g. through a review process or a continuous integration environment before it gets merged to its final destination.
[edit] Disadvantages
- Will often require many more merge conflict resolution by hand efforts.
- Many teams have long used and grown accustomed to the centralized model, and are reluctant to change
- Source code is considered the "crown jewels" of a software group. Centralized VCSs have been around much longer and thus perceived to be more stable
- Some projects want or need centralized control
- Distributed systems can end up with a person as the central point of control, rather than a server
- Concepts of DVCSs are slightly more difficult for developers to grasp. They become required to know more about infrastructure.
[edit] Work Model
The distributed model also impacts the traditional developer working model.
 |
Please help improve this section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. |
[edit] History
The first DVCS is Reliable Software's Code Co-op (1997). First generation DVCSes include Arch and Monotone. The second generation was prompted by the arrival of Darcs, followed by a host of others, including Mercurial, Bazaar, and Git.
See the List of revision control software for a more comprehensive list.
[edit] Future
Some natively centralized systems are starting to grow distributed features. For example, Subversion is able to do many operations with no network, and it is planning to implement local commits. It may become more difficult to separate natively distributed vs centralized systems.
Due to the explosion of new DVCSs in the last couple years, it is likely that some of them will slow down or die off.
There are many tools that rely on version control, such as wikis, file systems, and text editors. Some are starting to adopt DVCS features, and even integrate with them. E.g., the Gazest wiki.
[edit] See also
[edit] External links
- Essay on various revision control systems, especially the section "Centralized vs. Decentralized SCM"
- Linus Torvalds email describing DVCS to KDE developers
- Video of a talk Linus Torvalds gave about Git
- Bryan O'Sullivan video on Mercurial
- Ben Collins-Sussman (one of Subversion authors) article on "The Risks of Distributed Version Control"
- Distributed Version Control Systems - Why and How by Ian Clatworthy, Bazaar/Canonical
