Talk:Digital Blasphemy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page was previously nominated for deletion. Please see prior discussions before considering re-nomination: Keep, July 25, 2006, see discussion. No Consensus, 13 April 2006, see discussion.

This article was nominated for deletion on October 1, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

Contents 1 Cleanup tag 2 Advertisement 3 Wow 4 Source found

[edit] Cleanup tag

SC147: I've put a new image and enough new text to make it "better than average" on wikipedia, we have an image from the most famous wallpaper gallery on the net posted by permission, and certainly more information than we have on most "tagged" pages -- do you have any more comments on the cleanup tag that would prevent me from removing it in a week if the article is left as-is?

Ojw 23:48, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Advertisement

This is clearly an advertisement - not only does it go against the rules, it goes against common sense. Would you open any Encyclopedia and expect to see an entry like this??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vlweb3d (talk • contribs) 21:57, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Does this blatant puff piece for a commercial site really belong in an encyclopaedia?

• • It belongs here more than these two comments do. (No excuse to ever misspell encyclopedia if it's listed as a page title.)

"Encyclopaedia" is a perfectly correct and acceptable spelling. Please sign your posts. --Canley 08:53, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Agreed. Plus this is a perfectly notable site - it is not a 'spam site' as some in that deletion review allege, nor is it even a company. Perfectly legitimate, not even advertising. —Vanderdecken∴∫ξφ 13:31, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

• Listed for deletion. Discussion on deletion should go to the deletion discussion page. --Sascha.leib 09:57, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wow

I'm surprised this is even in here, but I guess Wikipedia really is that all-encompassing.

This is an advertisement. 64.140.73.93 17:41, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

I have a 3d site, http://www.3dwallpaperart.com, and I'm sure that if someone did an article about my website, that it would be deleted. Let him do normal advertising, like everybody else. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vlweb3d (talk • contribs) 21:43, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Source found

I'll put the link here as well: http://web.archive.org/web/20010604040436/www.zdnet.com/products/stories/reviews/0,4161,2661322,00.html This is the internet archive's archive of a story, "Yahoo! Internet Life's 100 Best Sites for 2001". Digital Blasphemy was chosen as the best Wallpaper site of 2001. While I put the link in the external links section of the article, it could go in the references section if the article text is based in part upon it. --Xyzzyplugh 13:24, 6 September 2006 (UTC)