User:DanielZimmerman
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome to my Wikipedia user page. It is under heavy construction. I hope to make it look much nicer.
This user is a member of the Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgments About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are in Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They Are Deletionists
 The motto of the AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTD is Est omnino difficile iudicare inclusionis meritum cuiusdam rei in encyclopædia cum ratio sciendi quid populi referat incerta sit, sed nihilominus aliquid encyclopædiam dedecet, which translates to, "it is generally difficult to judge the worthiness of a particular topic for inclusion in an encyclopedia considering that there is no certain way to know what interests people, but some topics nevertheless are not fit for an encyclopedia." This motto reflects the desire of these Wikipedians to be reluctant, but not entirely unwilling, to remove articles from Wikipedia. |
|
My Tower-o-Boxes
|
.gif/40px-Rotating_earth_(large).gif){kind=small}
[edit] Elitist Deletists
I reject WP:BIO and all other forms of notability "standards" for determining if an article should be included in or deleted from Wikipedia. Notability is relative, subjective, and a matter of POV. There are plenty of other policies and guidelines on Wikipedia that allow for the creation of a proper encyclopedia that is not paper.
[edit] Userboxes
Userboxes are supposed to go on userpages. Userpages are not encyclopedic so why does the content on them have to be? It make's no sense. Again, Wikipedia is not paper.
