Talk:Daniel Agger
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
The article on Daniel Agger is supported by the WikiProject on Football, which is an attempt to improve the quality and coverage of Association football related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page; if you have any questions about the project or the article ratings below, please consult the FAQ. |
|---|---|
| B | This article has been rated as b-Class on the quality scale. |
| Mid | This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
This article is supported by the England task force. |
 |
This article is supported by the Liverpool task force. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is supported by the Sports and games work group. | ||
Contents |
[edit] Delinking infobox
Since I garbled the link to Template talk:Football player infobox in the edit summary, here it is ;) Poulsen 07:15, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Keeping the Liverpool squad tidy
Hmm, maybe we can come to some sort of aggreement over this infobox. It would seem that you want it one way, and I want it the other.
After looking over the link you've left I'm still of the opinion that most of the links should be kept, with maybe the year links being lost as they are a little pointless. It's worth noting that if you have take your link's advice and have "a look at David Beckham, Vincent Kompany or Mbo Mpenza for examples" that most of them 'do' have links in their infoboxes. Alii h 17:34, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
- The links to individual years should follow the WP:DATE - as you say they are a little pointless. I agree that the infobox usage is highly inregular - I've written alot of articles with linked infoboxes, and only recently checked the infobox talk page to see what guidelines existed on linking and have been enforcing those since then. I see you started a discussion on the infobox talk page, I'll write something there - let's see what happens. Poulsen 18:22, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Top rated young defender
Daniel Agger is rated by many as the best young defender in Europe according to some news reports but I would like to take the views of other editors here in Wikipedia on whether he is the top-rated or not. If we all agree to the news report then I will add it. Looking forward to hearing from all of you.-3E933333Boy
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Agger.jpg
Image:Agger.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 01:48, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Tattoos
I don't want to be nitpicky but is there any source for the tattoos on his ankles? As far as I know, he rarely talks about his tattoos and the only words I've seen tattood on him are "memento mori" (underneath the viking) and "mors certa, hora incerta" on his back. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Manuanya (talk • contribs) 16:03, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Daniel Agger2.jpg
Image:Daniel Agger2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 16:54, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
