Collar (finance)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A collar is an investment strategy that uses options to limit the possible range of positive or negative returns on an investment in an underlying asset to a specific range. To do this, an investor simultaneously buys a put option and sells (writes) a call option on that asset. The strike price on the call needs to be above the strike price for the put, and the expiration dates should be the same.
After establishing the portfolio in this manner, the return on the portfolio will be between the strike price on the call (potential profit), and the strike price on the put (potential loss), meaning the possible gains and losses will always be within a preset limit.
[edit] Example
Consider an investor who owns 100 shares of a stock with a current price of $5. Calls on the stock are traded with a strike price of $7 and puts are traded with a strike price of $3. An investor would construct a collar by buying one put and selling one call. The collar would insure that the gain on the stock will be no higher than $2 and the loss will be no worse than $2. There are three possible scenarios when the options expire:
- If the stock price is above the $7 strike price on the call he wrote, the person who bought the call from the investor will exercise the purchased call; the investor will need to sell the shares at the $7 strike price. This would lock in a $2 profit for the investor. He only makes a $2 profit, no matter how high the share price goes.
- If the stock price dropped below the $3 strike price on the put then the investor will exercise the put and the person who sold it is forced to buy the investor's shares at $3. The investor loses $2 on the stock, but can only lose $2, no matter how low the price of the stock goes.
- If the stock price is between the two strike prices at the expiration date, both options expire unexercised, and the investor is left with the shares of the stock.
[edit] Why do this?
In times of high volatility, or in bear markets, it can be useful to limit the downside risk to a portfolio. One obvious way to do this is to sell the stock. In the above example, if an investor just sold the stock, the investor would get $5. This may be fine, but it poses additional questions. Does the investor have an acceptable investment available to put the money from the sale into? What are the transaction costs associated with liquidating the portfolio? Would the investor rather just hold onto the stock? What are the tax consequences?
If it makes more sense to hold on to the stock (or other underlying asset), the investor can limit that downside risk that lies below the strike price on the put in exchange for giving up the upside above the strike price on the call. Another advantage is that the cost of setting up a collar is (usually) free or nearly free. The price received is used for selling the call to buy the put—one pays for the other.
Finally, using a collar strategy takes the return from the probable to the definite. That is, when an investor owns a stock (or another underlying asset) and has an expected return, that expected return is only the mean of the distribution of possible returns, weighted by their likelihood. The investor may get a higher or lower return. When an investor who owns a stock (or other underlying asset) uses a collar strategy, the investor knows that the return can be no higher than the return defined by strike price on the call, and no lower than the return that results from the strike price of the put.
[edit] References
- Hull, John (2005). Fundamentals of Futures and Options Markets, 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. ISBN 0-13-144565-0.
|
||||||||||||||
