Talk:Clock Tower II: The Struggle Within
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| Low | This article is on a subject of Low priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0. | |
|
VG To-do:
|
||
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Adventure games, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of adventure games. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. |
[edit] PAL version
Was his ever released in Europe or Australia? If it indeed was, then could someone add the release date to the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.167.190.140 (talk) 11:21, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Release Dates
Game was released October 31, 1999 in North America and November 31, 1999 in Japan. Can someone add these information into the article, please? --Barneyinblue 11:40, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
I will add this the next sweep around, I just made some major spelling fixes and will add the rest of links and corrections soon. --William Pembroke 02:07, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the help. --Barneyinblue 11:40, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
"The game's engine was very cheaply slapped together as it's almost exactly identical to Clock Tower (Clock Tower 2 in Japan), with a few minor alterations. The players see their movements restricted by this system which, compared to other survival horrors of the time, wasn't well applied." Needs to be redone for neutral pov.
This is not a game review site, why people are blaming an old graphic engine? --Barneyinblue 08:30, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
I made it slightly more appropriate to Wikipedia. I, in truth, never played this game. This is the only game in the series I have yet to play. --William Pembroke 01:54, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Check Weasel Wording: Generalisation, and compare introduction. Removed the worst sentence, but the following needs to be redone as well:
- "The players see their movements restricted by this system which, compared to other survival horrors of the time, wasn't well applied"
- If you can get some source (ie: a game review, etc.) which you can attribute this view to, rather than using amibguous user descriptions, it will sound 900 times better. Cheers, Noble Kale 02:14, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
I agree that would sound a lot better even with a referance. I have yet to play, so for now I will just say something like "it is criticized for..." --William Pembroke 20:03, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Gratuitous Spoilers
There were several spoilers that added nothing to the article (such as "the player can choose to save her or let her die") that I removed. Yes, the page has a spoiler warning, but there's no need to spoil every last bit of the story. Kat, Queen of Typos 21:18, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
In response to the above topic...^^ Um, hun, YOU just spoiled something. And yet you talk about removing spoilers. Way to go.
