Talk:Classical genetics
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Genetics, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to genetics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this page, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating. |
 |
This article is within the scope of the Molecular and Cellular Biology WikiProject. To participate, visit the WikiProject for more information. The WikiProject's current monthly collaboration is focused on improving Restriction enzyme. |
||
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale. |
||
| High | This article is on a subject of High-importance within molecular and cellular biology. | ||
|
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|||
 |
This article is supported by the WikiProject on Medical Genetics, which gives a central approach to Medical genetics and related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article Classical genetics, or visit the project page for more details on the projects. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. |
[edit] I
I think that this entry should include some info. on the use of mutants in mapping genes, this was achieved well before the genetic code was known.--nixie 01:12, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
[edit] massive revert
I just did a massive revert on the page. I don't know what Rscavetta was trying to say with his large rewrite, but it sounded kind of weird to me. And incoherent. And possibly wrong. He doesn't appear to be an active user, so I'm just commenting on this here. It's disconcerting to see that his edits were made over a year ago, but I guess no one felt qualified to question his addition. -Madeleine 00:22, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
