Claim of right doctrine

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Taxation in the United States
This article is part of a series on Taxation
Federal taxation
Authority · History Internal Revenue Service Court · Forms · Code · Revenue
Income tax · Payroll tax Alternative Minimum Tax Estate tax · Excise tax Gift tax · Corporate tax Capital gains tax
State & local taxation
State income tax · State tax levels Sales tax · Use tax · Property tax
Federal tax reform Competitive Tax Plan Efficient Taxation of Income Real Property Use Tax Taxpayer Choice Act USA Tax · Value Added Tax FairTax · Flat tax
Tax protesting History America: Freedom to Fascism The Law that Never Was Cheek v. United States Notable tax protesters Irwin Schiff Richard Michael Simkanin Robert Clarkson · Tom Cryer Vivien Kellems Wayne C. Bentson Wesley Snipes
Tax protester arguments Constitutional Statutory · Conspiracy
Taxation by country Australia • British Virgin Islands Canada • China • Colombia France • Germany • Hong Kong India • Indonesia • Ireland Netherlands • New Zealand Peru • Russia • Singapore Tanzania • United Kingdom United States • European Union  v • d • e  Tax rates around the world Tax revenue as % of GDP
view • talk • edit

In the tax law of the United States the claim of right doctrine causes a taxpayer to recognize income if they receive the income even though they do not have a fixed right to the income. For the income to qualify as being received there must be a receipt of cash or property that ordinarily consitutes income rather than loans or gifts or deposits that are returnable, the taxpayer needs unlimited control on the use or disposition of the funds, and the taxpayer must hold and treat the income has its own. This law is largely created by the courts, but some aspects have been codified into the Internal Revenue Code.

Contents 1 History 2 Impact 3 See also 4 Example 5 References

[edit] History

The claim of right doctrine, as it dictates whether the "right" to the income subject to a contingency that may take the income away is taxable in the US, originated in the North American Oil Consolidated v. Burnet decision.^[1] This court decision said that a taxpayer's income subject to a contingency that may take away the income but a taxpayer receives it "without restriction as to its disposition, [a taxpayer] has received income" even if a taxpayer "is required to return" it and a taxpayer "may still be adjudged liable to restore" it. A taxpayer must report the receipt of income for the time that she or he has control over it.

If a taxpayer ends up having to return the income recognized under the claim of right doctrine, then the taxpayer may receive a tax credit for that amount according to the Internal Revenue Code.^[2]

The courts limited the claim of right doctrine and will not allow the IRS to make the taxpayer recognize income if there are significant restrictions on the taxpayer's disposition of the income.^[3]

[edit] Impact

The claim of right doctrine has become a source of abuse attempted by taxpayers seeking to evade paying their income tax by claiming that they do not have a right to the income.^[4]

[edit] See also

• Tax accounting
• Cash Method v. Accrual Method

[edit] Example

An example such a transaction is on the popular TV show "Survivor: Fiji" when Yao-Man agreed to trade the truck he had one with Dreamz in exchange for the immunity idol if Dreamz won it. If Dreamz did not win immunity, he would not have to give it to Yao-Man, but would still have the truck.^[5]

[edit] References