Talk:Circle Sanctuary
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    |
This article is part of WikiProject Neopaganism, a WikiProject dedicated to expanding, organizing, verifying, and NPOVing articles related to neopagan religions. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Wisconsin. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page.
If you give this article a rating or change a previous rating, please leave a short summary in the comments to explain the rating and/or identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
|
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale. |
[edit] Circle Sanctuary
I do not think this article should be deleted. According to the article, Circle Sanctuary is well known internationally. Keep the article. Thank you-RFD 12:56, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Article has been undeleted as of today. I think the historical context for CS (which will mostly be pulled from books and not off the Interweb, I expect) will be key to making sure that people unfamiliar with the topic recognize the importance of Circle Sanctuary. Since I don't have time personally right now to edit/improve articles much, I appreciate others taking the time to do so. -- nae'blis 15:55, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Secondary sources needed
Many thanks to Nae'blis and Majorly for facilitating the return of this article. I will try and encourage the addition of further good secondary sources: I can quite see that without these the article as it stood lacked credibility. Kim Dent-Brown (Talk to me) 15:54, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
