User talk:Cigraphix
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia
Welcome!
Hello, Cigraphix, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Tellyaddict 14:41, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Shadow being "immortal"
Unless you can find me the exact statement in SA2 about Shadow being imortal, im inclined to take that bit with a grain of salt. The ending of SA2 would highly contridict that statement and the factor of his explanation of how he survived easly contridicts the statement of him being imortal. If he was, why would he need a robot to save him? If he wasn't saved by the robot, then what would happen? This is the first instance of me hearing about him being immortal and i've also translated Sonic Channel and nothing is stated about him being imortal either so either SOA mistranslated something or they have no idea what they're talking about.--Neofcon (talk) 01:11, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
About the 50 year/200 year gig, I can explain that. Shadow is just to damn powerful. I doubt that Gun was ever capable of killing him at that point (or at all). It's more about common sense rather than facts listed. Shadow's power is enormous, and with all the powers he has, do you think any "human" force could kill him by normal means. The 200 year gap can also be explained. You can be frozen for over any lengthy period of time, and the same reason that gun froze him before. It might not be the factor that he can't be killed but it could be that they simply can't. What I mean is with that says "Gerald wanted a project to achieve imortality and save Maria's Life. But there's nothing saying if he succeeded or not. Any translations found if he did make him "immortal" or what not? Btw how does creating a specific lifeform become a cure for someone else? This is the confusing part, because you create a lifeform for the sole purpose of saving someone else's life. Would it be his genes from the Aliens (who were infact NOT immortal since they are dead) or the energy of the energy of the Chaos Emeralds who could transform thoughts into power (likely being Gerald's thoughts of w/e but in the same stance we'd have to take into account what Doom's thoughts were at the same time...then again 06 was completely deus ex and most of the events in that game (including shadow's frost bite) was completely retconned ANYWAY so who knows?). Well w/e, this whole thing is starting to give me a headache, so thank you for the butt load of info and no I didn't hear about the translations (hell I didn't have internet back in 01) and so get back to me if you can.--Neofcon (talk) 16:17, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
The cryogenesis from 50 years can be easly seen with the cold mist air coming from shadow's rising.....bed...tube....w/e the hell they call those things. From that we can deduce it's cryogenic stasis. And no i've never heard that saying lol. Though i'd like to point out something. Immortality doesn't necessarly mean you CAN'T be killed. It generally means you can live a long life for whatever length without dying from age (you essentially don't grow old) or desease (one helluva immune system which was probably what Gerald was after). Bacteria is a good example of this. Immortality has sometimes been mis-interpreted as "you wont die from anything". I dont know how it works in Sonic's world but living 50 years off cryo stasis is, in a sense, an immortal gig. And then we'd have to go back to your question "why would they keep him alive". Thats all left to specs. Could be they wanted to do something with him like use him as a weapon or thought freezing him would be enough and they felt pity after killing so many people. Or possibly the guy from SHTH wasn't in charge yet (ya know, the one hated shadow for no reason CEPT assumptions that he killed Maria). Who knows? Did sega say? Not at all and once again we're left in the dark. The part about "cannot be killed" from 06's site doesn't at all sound plausible (then again nothing on that site does as it spouts more nonsense than the game it advertises) as we still have SA2's ending to go by.............followed by the fan service of bringing him back via the worst explanation of all time. Sonic Team....--Neofcon (talk) 23:49, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] That last sonic edit you reverted
I've had it with DBZ comparisons. Im putting a notice up about this.......but uh..how do I do that?--Neofcon (talk) 15:16, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Naw tis cool. Thanx.--Neofcon (talk) 00:09, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Chaos Emeralds
An editor has nominated Chaos Emeralds, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaos Emeralds and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 16:19, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Amy Rose
Yeah, I noticed that. I was going to revert my edit, but you beat me. Oh well, thanks --Antonio Lopez (talk) 00:39, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Kia Stevens
Hi, you undid a note i added to the Kia Stevens article about her mother passing away. Why would i lie about something like that? I bought an autograph through paypal from her and she sent me a message (which i've saved) saying it'll be a while as her mom died yesterday Talia madison (talk) 02:08, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Kia has posted a blog re: her moms funeral arrangements etc through her official confirmed myspace which is her confirmed myspace via her official website as well, lol - i just wanted you to know i wasn't lying about it lol =] I thought you stuck to the Sonic articles lol =] Talia madison (talk) 02:08, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Invitation
 |
|
|
|
To Cigraphix Please Join The Sega Project We Think You Would Make Great Member Of Our Project!.Gaogier Talk! 19:05, 6 February 2008 (UTC) |
[edit] Meta Knight
Saw your debate on Wikiproject Videogames about Sonic Characters. Thought you made a great argument. Looking for support on similar argument for same editor on Meta Knight page and Talk:List of Kirby characters. Your eloquence with such arguement, asking if you might stop by the talk page. I need no response, just popping in to see if this would interest you. -66.109.248.114 (talk) 22:32, 6 February 2008 (UTC).
- Thanks for thinking so highly of it, but I'm sorry I don't feel I should go chasing around editors trying to make them see the "error of their ways." I also don't know as much about it and I don't know how TTN has acted during it so I may not be able to give any argument I make the same weight. If TTN has been acting as inappropriately as he was in my short experience with him, the arguement I made can be used as a road map and reference point to hold against him. Cigraphix (talk) 02:11, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Quick Question
Hi, i'm not sure if you're the right person to be asking but you were helpful with the Kia Stevens article.
I deleted the 'official' website links for TNA wrestlers Homicide and Hernandez because after having looked at their websites and at their affiliates i was positive they were just run by fans. Their affiliates were links to other 'official sites' which included websites for Melina Perez, A fake Kurt Angle website, Mickie James etc - all of whom have said via WWE that they do not have a website or a myspace of any kind.
There is a user who keeps re-adding the links and asking me to proove that they arn't the official sites. I've deleted them now 3 times. Should the honus be on the websites to provide they are real and not for me to prove that they are fake?
I'd appreciate it if you could have a look at the sites and let me know what you think. The layout is the standard layout used on fan sites as well (i run my own).(links are on my 'my talk' page as the user who keeps re-adding the links: User:Nenog left me a message).
Thanks =] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Talia madison (talk • contribs) 18:02, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for taking a look at it, i'm just really wary about some 'official' sites as i spent months compiling real sites, myspaces of wrestlers, indy wrestlers and international wrestlers and alot of the sites listed in the external links sections were either fan based or links were no longer there so i edited them. Some guy i don't know (he isn't a moderator), accused me of edit warring - i didn't realise trying to do something useful was against the rules - the other guy is the one who won't drop it. Thanks anyway :-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Talia madison (talk • contribs) 01:00, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
